Developments in the 19th Century



 




Art Styles in 19th century - Art Map


 




The Impressionism



 



see collection:


Camille Pissarro


 




In the feverish cultural climate of Paris in the 1860s, a group of about 30 artists
began to experiment with a new form of expression. They were to go down in
history as the Impressionists, their work marking the frontier between modern
art and that of their own time. Today, Impressionist paintings are among
the most admired and sought-after in the world.
 

 

Impressionism did not arise from any specific theory or manifesto. It was more the result of certain artists sharing the same ideas at a particular moment in French history, when the climate helped to spread and establish a new style of painting. The movement, with its distinctive artistic style, evolved in quite a complex way. The first signs of its development appeared in the early 1860s, but a collective consciousness was not evident until the period between 1867 and 1869. The motivating force behind Impressionism was the desire of a small number of artists to approach painting in a way completely opposed to that practised in the official, sacrosanct surroundings of the Parisian institution, the Salon. The artists, who were of widely differing personalities and from a variety of schools, found themselves embarking separately, and quite instinctively, on a new style. The subject matter, techniques, and artistic language of their work were all features that were to set Impressionism quite clearly apart from the traditional world of academic art.

 

 

 

A Short-lived Movement

In the late 1860s, three artists - Monet, Renoir, and Pissarro - formed the habit of going to sit on the banks of the Seine and Oise to paint the countryside. Of paramount interest to them was the reflection of light on the river; it seemed to be constantly moving and giving life to the water. The many colours revealed in the reflections gave them the idea of painting light by applying bands of opposing colours, without using dark tones for the shadows. With this in mind, they brightened up their palettes and divided up the different shades, unaware that they were applying the theory  of complementary colours. No particular date marks the birth of the Impressionist movement, although the year 1869 was certainly significant. It was then that Monet and Renoir both painted at La Grenouillere, the open-air cafe and bathing resort near Bougival. Each completed works that are now viewed as landmarks of early Impressionism. However, it was not until 1874, after a long and arduous quest to master this new means of expression, that the Impressionists exhibited their work in public for the first time. By 1880, just six years after that first show, the group had already broken up. It is possible that the process of setting down an "impression" of a scene in a spontaneous, clear, and objective way required a naive and enthusiastic approach that was, by its very nature, quickly lost. What is clear is that Impressionism occupies an remarkably short period of time in the history of art. Yet despite its brevity of life, the achievements of its artists in these few years are of incalculable importance.
 

 

 


Claude Monet
Impression, Sunrise
Oil on canvas
1873
 

 

 



Origins in the 19th century

(Encyclopaedia Britannica)



Impressionism

The first steps toward a systematic Impressionist style were taken in France in Monet's coast scenes from 1866 onward, notably the “Terrace” (1866; Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City), in which he chose a subject that allowed use of a full palette of primary colour. The decisive development took place in 1869, when Monet and Renoir painted together at the resort of La Grenouillère on the Seine River. The resulting pictures suggest that Monet contributed the pattern of separate brushstrokes, the light tonality, and the brilliance of colour; Renoir the overall iridescence, feathery lightness of touch, and delight in the recreation of ordinary people. Working at Louveciennes from 1869, Pissarro evolved the drier and more flexible handling of crumbly paint that was also to be a common feature of Impressionist painting.

It was in the environs of Paris after the Franco-Prussian War that there developed the fully formed landscape style that remains the most popular achievement of modern painting. An exhibition held in the studio of the photographer Nadar (Gaspard-Félix Tournachon) in 1874 included Monet's picture “Impression: Sunrise” (Marmottan Museum, Paris), and it was this work that, by being disparaged as mere “impressionism,” gave a name to an entire movement. The exhibition itself revealed three main trends. The Parisian circle around Monet and Renoir had developed the evanescent and sketchlike style the furthest. The vision of those working near Pissarro in Pontoise and Auvers was in general more solid, being firmly rooted in country scenes. A relatively urbane, genrelike trend was detectable in Degas's picture of Paul Valpinçon and his family at the races called “Carriage at the Races” (1870–73; Museum of Fine Arts, Boston) and Berthe Morisot's “The Cradle” (1873; Louvre [see ]). Manet himself was absent, hoping for academic success; his “Gare Saint-Lazare” (1873; National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.), influenced by the Impressionist palette, was accepted at the Salon. Modeling himself on Pissarro, Cézanne sublimated the turbulent emotions of his earlier work in pictures that were studied directly and closelyfrom nature; he followed the method for the rest of his life.

The experiment of an independent exhibition was repeated in 1876, though with fewer participants. Monet now began to make studies of the Gare Saint-Lazare. Renoir used effects of dappled light and shadow to explore genre subjects such as “Le Moulin de la galette” (1876; Louvre [see ]). In 1877 only 18 artists exhibited. The major painters began to go their separate ways, particularly as there were disputes about whether to continue with the independent exhibitions. Cézanne, who did not exhibit with the Impressionists again, was perhaps the first to realize that a critical stage had been reached. For the first time, a style had been based on the openly individual character of a technique rather than on the form of a particular subject or the way it was formulated. A style that admits to painting as being only a matter of paint raises in a peculiarly acute form the question of how far the qualities of art are intrinsic. Impressionism in the 1870s was inseparable from heightened visual experience of a sensuously satisfying world. But the blocklike shapes in Cézanne's pictures, such as the portrait of his patron Victor Chocquet (c. 1877; Columbus Museum of Art, Ohio), suggest that for him the relationship between the colour patches on his canvas was equally important. In the years that followed,he systematized his technique into patterns of parallel brushstrokes that gave a new significance to the pictorial surface (see ). An unassuming series of still lifes and self-portraits by Cézanne were painted in 1879–80, and these, when they became known, profoundly impressed the younger generation, who reckoned them to be as monumental as the great art of the past, yet in a subtly different way that was inherent in the actual manner of painting.

The style of the 1870s was formless from a traditional standpoint, and at the beginning of the next decade Renoir decided that he had gone to the limit with Impressionism and “did not know either how to paint or draw.” Following a trip to Italy, he set about acquiring a wiry, linear style that was the direct opposite of his relaxed, freely brushed manner of earlier years.

The appearance of a new generation posed a fresh challenge. Georges Seurat was moving away from the empirical standpoint of Impressionism toward a technique (Pointillism) and a form that were increasingly deliberately designed. Paul Gauguin, taking his starting point from Cézanne's style of about 1880, passed from a capricious personal type of Impressionism to a greater use of symbols. He exhibited with the Impressionists from 1880 onward, but it was soon evident that group shows could no longer accommodate the growing diversity. In 1884, after the Salon jury had been particularly harsh, the Société des Artistes Indépendants was formed. The last Impressionist group show was held in 1886. Only Monet and Armand Guillaumin, to whose efforts the group owed much of its eventual recognition, were now in the strict sense Impressionists. Monet, who had exhibited only once since 1879, continued to build on the original foundation of the style, the rendering of visual impression through colour in paintings that studied a single motif in varying lights. For him the formlessness and the homogeneity of Impressionism were its ultimate virtues. In his last series of “Water Lilies,” painted between 1906 and 1926, the shimmering of light eventually lost its last descriptive content, and only the colour and curling movement of his brush carried a general all-pervading reference to the visual world. Renoir's later work was equally expansive; his sympathetic vision of humanity revealed its own inherent breadth and grandeur.

Impressionism, in one aspect, continued the main directionof 19th-century painting, and after 1880 the movement was an international one, taking on independent national characteristics. Russia produced an exponent in Isaak Ilich Levitan, and Scotland one in William MacTaggart. In Italy Telemarco Signorini and in the United States such painters as Childe Hassam developed modified forms of the style. In France, and to some extent in Germany with Max Liebermann, Impressionism provided a basis for the styles that followed.


Impressionism

French Impressionnisme a major movement, first in painting and later inmusic, that developed chiefly in France during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Impressionist painting comprises the work produced betweenabout 1867 and 1886 by a group of artists who shared a set of related approaches and techniques. The most conspicuous characteristic of Impressionism was an attempt to accurately and objectively record visual reality in terms of transient effects of light and colour. The principal Impressionist painters were Claude Monet, Pierre Auguste Renoir, Camille Pissarro, Alfred Sisley, Berthe Morisot, Armand Guillaumin, and Frédéric Bazille, who worked together, influenced each other,and exhibited together independently. Edgar Degas and PaulCézanne also painted in an Impressionist style for a time in the early 1870s. The established painter Édouard Manet, whose work in the 1860s greatly influenced Monet and others of the group, himself adopted the Impressionist approach about 1873.

These artists became dissatisfied early in their careers with academic teaching's emphasis on depicting a historical or mythological subject matter with literary or anecdotal overtones. They also rejected the conventional imaginative or idealizing treatments of academic painting. By the late 1860s, Manet's art reflected a new aesthetic—which was to be a guiding force in Impressionist work—in which the importance of the traditional subject matter was downgraded and attention was shifted to the artist's manipulation of colour, tone, and texture as ends in themselves. In Manet's painting the subject became a vehicle for the artful composition of areas of flat colour, and perspectival depth was minimized so that the viewer would look at the surface patterns and relationships of the picture rather than into the illusory three-dimensional space it created. About the same time, Monet was influenced by the innovative painters Eugene Boudin and J.R. Jongkind, who depicted fleeting effects of sea and sky by means of highly coloured and texturally varied methods of paint application. The Impressionists also adopted Boudin's practice of painting entirely out-of-doors while looking at the actual scene, instead of finishing up his painting from sketches in the studio, as was the conventional practice.

In the late 1860s Monet, Pisarro, Renoir, and others began painting landscapes and river scenes in which they tried to dispassionately record the colours and forms of objects as they appeared in natural light at a given time. These artists abandoned the traditional landscape palette of muted greens, browns, and grays and instead painted in a lighter, sunnier, more brilliant key. They began by painting the play of light upon water and the reflected colours of its ripples, trying to reproduce the manifold and animated effects of sunlight and shadow and of direct and reflected light that they observed. In their efforts to reproduce immediate visualimpressions as registered on the retina, they abandoned the use of grays and blacks in shadows as inaccurate and used complementary colours instead. More importantly, they learned to build up objects out of discrete flecks and dabs of pure harmonizing or contrasting colour, thus evoking the broken-hued brilliance and the variations of hue produced bysunlight and its reflections. Forms in their pictures lost their clear outlines and became dematerialized, shimmering and vibrating in a re-creation of actual outdoor conditions. And finally, traditional formal compositions were abandoned in favour of a more casual and less contrived disposition of objects within the picture frame. The Impressionists extended their new techniques to depict landscapes, trees, houses, and even urban street scenes and railroad stations.

In 1874 the group held its first show, independent of the official Salon of the French Academy, which had consistentlyrejected most of their works. Monet's painting “Impression: Sunrise” (1872; Musée Marmottan, Paris) earned them the initially derisive name “Impressionists” from the journalist Louis Leroy writing in the satirical magazine Le Charivari in 1874. The artists themselves soon adopted the name as descriptive of their intention to accurately convey visual “impressions.” They held seven subsequent shows, the last in 1886. During that time they continued to develop their own personal and individual styles. All, however, affirmed in their work the principles of freedom of technique, a personal rather than a conventional approach to subject matter, and the truthful reproduction of nature.

By the mid-1880s the Impressionist group had begun to dissolve as each painter increasingly pursued his own aesthetic interests and principles. In its short existence, however, it had accomplished a revolution in the history of art, providing a technical starting point for the Postimpressionist artists Paul Cézanne, Edgar Degas, Paul Gauguin, Vincent van Gogh, and Georges Seurat and freeing all subsequent Western painting from traditional techniques and approaches to subject matter.

In music, Claude Debussy has always been considered the principal Impressionist. Even though Debussy was influenced by the general aesthetic attitudes of Impressionist painters, he made no attempts to compose with musical techniques that were closely analogous to techniques of painting. Furthermore, the characteristics of Debussy's music are so variable from the first through the last of his compositions that even a general sense of Impressionism might best be restricted to most of his music composed between about 1892 to 1903 and to certain specific later compositions strongly resembling those works in style. Some of these Impressionist works would be the opera Pelléas et Mélisande (first performed in 1902), the orchestral piece “Nuages” (“Clouds,” from Nocturnes, completed in 1899), and the piano piece “Voiles” (“Sails,” from Douze Préludes, Book I, 1910). Other composers considered Impressionistic include Maurice Ravel, Frederick Delius, Ottorino Respighi, Karol Szymanowski, and Charles Griffes.

Musical Impressionism is often thought to refer to subtle fragility, amorphous passivity, and vague mood music. A more accurate characterization of Impressionist music wouldinclude restraint and understatement, a static quality, and a provocatively colourful effect resulting from composers' fascination with pure sound as a beautiful and mysterious end in itself. Technically, these characteristics often result from a static use of harmony, ambiguous tonality, a lack of sharp formal contrasts and of onward rhythmic drive, and a blurring of the distinction between melody and accompaniment. Although Impressionism has been considered a movement away from the excesses of Romanticism, the sources of many of its characteristics may be found in the works of composers who are also considered to be the Romantic precursors of Expressionism—e.g., Franz Liszt, Richard Wagner, and Aleksandr Scriabin.

 

 

 

 


The Pioneers of Impressionism

Among the leading Impressionists was Camille Pissarro (1830-1903). Born on the island of St Thomas in the West Indies to a Creole mother and a Jewish father of Spanish origin, he always painted his exotic canvases in strong and lively colours. He never attempted to portray the lightness of air and water but remained attached to the solidity of his subject matter. His preoccupations with the rules of composition led him to depict three-dimensional space with minute, separate dots, a technique that would form the heart of pointillism and divisionism. Uncompromising, tenacious, and an anarchist, he was the oldest of the Impressionists and therefore had some authority in the eyes of the other artists - Cezanne said of him: "He is a man to consult; he is a bit like God."
A participant in all the Impressionist exhibitions, Pissarro promoted and defended the movement from the beginning, claiming: "The Impressionists are in the right, supporting a solid art based on sensations, and it is an honest viewpoint." Widely considered to be the most consistent of the Impressionist group, Alfred Sisley (1839-99) was born in Paris of English parents. He devoted himself almost exclusively to landscapes, mostly painting the countryside to the west of Paris, where he lived. His work was dominated by images of the River Seine, the floodwaters at Port-Marly, rows of poplars, reflections on the snow, and the delicate mist that hung over the fields. The sky was an important element in his work, and he employed various techniques to create a sky that "would not be simply a background." His canvases were not highly esteemed during his lifetime and were less respected than those of the other Impressionists. Little by little his paintings lost their vitality, becoming less interesting and more simplistic. Claude Monet (1840-1926), the painter most faithful to his visual sensations, was described by Cezanne as "Only an eye but my God, what an eye!" It was Monet who encouraged the other members of the group to paint out of doors. His canvas exhibited at the first Impressionist show in 1874 was called Impression, Sunrise, which prompted the journalist Louis Leroy to label the whole group the "Impressionists". In Monet's works, form is lost in the quest to depict light. The artist took this to such extremes that he went beyond merely transcribing what he saw: with vague shapes for subjects and colours broken up into thousands of gradations, his paintings verged on the abstract. Together with Monet and Pissarro, Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) was one of the first to spread the doctrine of Impressionism at the end of the 1860s. He filled his canvases with a steady, diffused light, bringing figures and landscapes together under one rhythmic and constant source of illumination. In 1881, he visited Rome, where he found "the wisdom of Raphael'', who "like me, looks for the impossible." Impressionism, the "impossible" undertaking that seemed to challenge the very shape of nature, found in Renoir's work a unique, structural solidity in his depiction of young women. These figures became increasingly more imposing but were graceful and softly lit: "I believe I have been able to achieve the grandeur of Antiquity," he declared. A friend of Renoir, Monet, and Sisley, Frederic Bazille (1841-70) was never a fully committed Impressionist. "I wish to give each subject its own weight and volume and not paint only outward appearances," he said. Tragically, Bazille's career was cut short when he was killed in action during the Franco-Prussian war.
Armand Guillaumin (1841-1927) displayed works at all the Impressionist exhibitions except those of 1876 and 1879. His palette became increasingly brilliant and unnatural. The vivid colours were arranged in sharp contrasts, similar to those found in the work of Paul Gauguin. Berthe Morisot (1841-95), the daughter of wealthy parents and a descendant of the painter Fragonard, exhibited regularly at the official Salon before opting enthusiastically to join the Impressionists. She took part in all but one of their shows and, in 1868, met Edouard Manet, who became her teacher and close friend. She later married his brother Eugene. The two artists influenced each other greatly, and it was Morisot who persuaded Manet to experiment with the "rainbow palette" of the Impressionists. In her own work, she never used the group's trademark short, broken brushstrokes but retained her own delicate, feathery technique. Morisot's women - reading, cooking, and tending to children - are solid forms with great presence, not figures swept away by the passing moment. Edouard Manet (1832-83) was in many ways separate from the Impressionists. The son of a Paris magistrate, he was a fashionable, urbane gentleman painte and friend of the poets Mallarme and Baudelaire. He sought the approval of the most influential critics and recognition from the official Salon and found their constant rejection very upsetting. In terms of influence, Manet owed his masterly handling of pigment, known as peinture claire, to Courbet and Velazquez. Later, Japanese art had a deep impact on his work, and his subjects, often finished in the studio, became more unreal and flattened. The colour was spread directly over the white canvas, with none of the half-tones of the academic painter. His first one-man exhibition, held in 1863 at the Galerie Marinet, was an important event for the Impressionists, who in the same year exhibited at the Salon des Refuses. In the 1870s, Manet, influenced by Morisot, had more contact with the group. Leaving his studio to paint outdoors, his work became lighter and more spontaneous, capturing with immediacy the farewells at a port in Departure of the Folkestone Boat (1868-71) and catching the sparkle of the water in The Seine at Argenteuil (1874). Although a regular participant in their exhibitions, Edgar Degas (1834-1917) never considered himself a true Impressionist, claiming, "There is nothing less spontaneous than my art." The son of a wealthy banker and a Creole woman, he found early inspiration in the work of the Renaissance masters. He preferred painting in his studio to out of doors and favoured artificial light over sunlight - he found it highlighted the movements of his famous ballerinas. Mary Cassatt (1844-1926), from an American banking family with French ancestors, shared with her friend Degas a special love for drawing. She exhibited with the Impressionists for the first time in 1879. Her linear style and talent for combining separate elements led her to the creation of the coloured lithographs and engravings that are among her most successful works. Giuseppe de Nittis (1846-84), a friend of Degas, Manet, Caillebotte, and Toulouse-Lautrec, participated in the first Impressionist exhibition of 1874 with five paintings. His scenes depicting the elegant society of Parisian life and his impressions of London were a great success. In 1878 he was awarded the Legion of Honour. Paul Cezanne (1839-1906) exhibited with the Impressionists in 1874 and 1877 but, like Degas, never identified himself with the group or wholly embraced their ideas. With the exception of Pissarro, with whom he shared a long and productive friendship, they did not completely understand him. When Cezanne started painting, his art was romantic, heroic, and erotic. Initially, he used thick, dark paint, but after meeting some of the group, his palette became lighter. Rather than catching fleeting impressions and the transient effects of light, he preferred to contemplate his subject in order to produce more structured, balanced, and geometric compositions. He gave up his brush for a palette knife, which was better suited to reproducing the mass and volume of his subjects, and forgot about painting atmospheres. Towards the end of his life, he returned to his home town, Aix-en-Provence, to paint nature "in the sphere, the cone, and the cylinder." He concentrated on landscapes, particularly views of Mont Sainte-Victoire, and claimed: "One must learn to paint from these simple forms; one will then be able to do whatever one wishes." Also difficult to classify as true Impressionists are the French artist and collector Gustave Caillebotte (1848-94), who painted contemporary life in a classical style, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864-1901), whose subjects reveal a genuine sense of tragedy.
 

 


Various Kinds of Impressionism

The key protagonists of Impressionism did not work according to any programme or plan, nor did they have any preconceived ideas. In fact, they felt liberated and free: Renoir boasted that he did not know from one day to the next what he was going to paint, while Monet claimed he painted just like a bird sings. Although the Impressionists remained a harmonious group, all the artists connected with the movement spent a significant amount of time working independently, resolving any problems they came up against each according to his or her own instincts. Even the writer Zola, a friend of Cezanne and great supporter of Manet and Impressionism, could not quite grasp what it was that unified the group. In his articles in L'Evenement he tried in vain to find the right definition. There was certainly much discussion about their work among the Parisian painters at the Cafe Taranne and Cafe Guerbois, but this almost always proved sterile. "Don't ask me whether a painting should be objective or subjective. I couldn't care less," Renoir would say, uninterested in confronting the stylistic problems that obsessed Cezanne or Seurat.
 

 

 

 

CAMILLE PISSARRO

The Creole of the Impressionists, Pissarro started drawing as a child in Venezuela. In France, he pursued an active, artistic life, preferring Rouen, Dieppe, and other towns to the capital that so inspired the other artists. His career followed a course of continuous artistic experimentation, which placed him closest to Seurat among the Impressionists. He produced mainly plein air paintings of rural landscapes and urban views.
 

 

 

 


Camille Pissarro

(Encyclopaedia Britannica)

born July 10, 1830, St. Thomas, Danish West Indies
died Nov. 13, 1903, Paris


French Impressionist painter, who endured prolonged financial hardship inkeeping faith with the aims of Impressionism. Despite acute eye trouble, his later years were his most prolific. The Parisianand provincial scenes of this period include “Place du Théâtre Française” (1898) and “Bridge at Bruges” (1903).

Pissarro was the son of a prosperous Jewish merchant, Abraham Gabriel Pissarro, and Rachel Manzano-Pomié. At the age of 12 he left home for studies in Paris, where he showed an early interest in art. Returning to the West Indies after five years to work in his father's store, he began makingsketches of the exotic island and its people. Because he was unable to obtain his father's permission to study art, he ran away to Caracas in 1853 and remained there for two years with the Danish painter Fritz Melbye. Finally, Pissarro's father relented, and in 1855 he returned to France. His earliest canvases, dating from this period, are figure paintings and landscapes of the tropics and of the French countryside; although broadly painted, they show the carefulobservation of nature that was to remain a characteristic of his art throughout his life.

The uninspired academic teaching at the École des Beaux-Arts, where he was enrolled, led Pissarro to seek outthe painter Camille Corot, who permitted Pissarro to call himself Corot's “pupil” at a Salon exhibition in 1864. At this time Pissarro was also attracted to the rural, sentimental paintings of the Barbizon artist Jean-François Millet and to the works of Gustave Courbet, the leading proponent of everyday Realism. During the 1860s Pissarro participated in the famous Parisian Café Guerbois discussions, in which artists and writers exchanged ideas, and worked with the younger painters Auguste Renoir and Claude Monet. To escape the Franco-German War, in 1870 Pissarro fled to England; there he and Monet, who had also fled France, visited the museums, where they viewed British landscape paintings. It was in London that Pissarro married Julie Vellay, formerly his mother's maid, who had already borne him two of their seven children.

When Pissarro returned to France in 1871, he found his house in Louveciennes looted and a great number of his paintings destroyed. Soon he was to look for another house in Pontoise. (Because it was costly to live in Paris, Pissarro, like several of his painter friends, lived in villages not far from the city.) His surroundings formed the theme of his art for some 30 years and were always carefully chosen: “I require a spot that has beauty!” At Pontoise he was joined by Paul Cézanne in 1872, and the two of them painted out-of-doors, even in the middle of winter.

Pissarro's paintings are never dramatic; on the contrary, his leading motifs during the 1870s and 1880s are simply houses, factories, trees, haystacks, fields, labouring peasants, and river scenes. Forms do not dissolve but remainfirm, and colours are strong; during the latter part of the 1870s his comma-like brushstrokes frequently recorded the sparkling scintillation of light, as in “Orchard with Flowering Fruit Trees, Springtime, Pontoise” (1877). Although his paintings were sold by the dealer Paul Durand-Ruel, who represented several of the Impressionists, Pissarro continued to experience financial hardships, which he described in letters to his eldest son, Lucien; this remarkablecorrespondence began in 1883 and lasted for 20 years.

In some of the letters to his son, Pissarro expressed dissatisfaction with his own work. Preoccupied by problems of style and technique, he eagerly embraced the Neo-Impressionist theories of Georges Seurat, whom he met in 1885 through the painter Paul Signac. Seurat's technique, consisting of meticulously painted small dots of juxtaposed colours, was adopted by Pissarro; for about five years he painted in this “divisionist” manner, a style which made his works unpopular with dealers, collectors, and even his old fellow artists. Overwhelmingly discouraged by their continuing state of poverty, Madame Pissarro considered drowning herself and their two youngest children. Finally, Pissarro abandoned the style, not, however, because of theopposition he met but because “it was impossible to be true to my sensations and consequently to render life and movement, impossible to be faithful to the effects, so random and so admirable, of nature . . . .” At about this time, also, there was an estrangement from Paul Gauguin, who hadformerly worked at his side but now was involved with the new Symbolist movement.

A large and successful retrospective exhibition of Pissarro's paintings was held by Durand-Ruel in 1892, giving the artist greater financial stability, although by this time he was troubled by a chronic eye infection that frequently made it impossible for him to work out-of-doors. Both in 1893 and 1897 he took hotel rooms in Paris from which he painted 24 canvases of the city's streets by day and by night, in sun, rain, and fog. During the 1890s he also did a series of river scenes in Rouen, likewise depicting the various effects of nature. From 1900 until his death three years later, Pissarro continued working, mainly in Paris, Éragny, Dieppe, and Le Havre, with freshness of vision and increasing freedom in his technique. More than 1,600 works, consisting of oils, gouaches, temperas, pastels—and even paintings on fans and on porcelain—as well as nearly 200 fine prints, give testimony to the high quality of Pissarro's half century of work.

Pissarro was the only Impressionist painter who participated in all eight of the group's exhibitions. His kindness, warmth, wisdom, and encouraging words cast him in a fatherly role to struggling younger artists—Monet, Renoir, Cézanne, and Gauguin—who were exploring new means of personal expression. Despite financial burdens that continued until he reached his 60s, Pissarro never lost faith in the new art, believing that “one must be sure of success to the very end, for without that there is no hope!”

Michele Vishny
 

 

 

 

THE BOULEVARDS

Towards the middle of the 19th century, Paris underwent a massive rebuilding programme to turn into a quintessentially modern city. In the heart of the city, whole districts were demolished to make way for wide, tree-lined boulevards. In literature, Balzac and, later, Baudelaire evoked the daily activities of the ostentatious Parisian life of these great avenues. In art, Pissarro, Monet, Renoir, Sisley, Caillebotte, and Manet produced luminous and airy paintings to document the innovations of the town-planner Baron Haussmann. At the Impressionist exhibition of 1877, the critic Jacques is said to have commented: "So, four Impressionists have given themselves the mission of reproducing Paris, M. Caillebotte has chosen the street; M. Renoir the ball; M. Degas the theatre and the cafe-concert; Mlle. Berthe Morisot the boudoir. Besides this, of course, there are some excursions to the country, but still rendered by Parisian brushes."

 


Claude Monet
Boulevard Montmarte
1897

 

 


Claude Monet
La calle Saint-Honoré después del mediodía. Efecto de lluvia
1897

 

 


Claude Monet
Avenue de l'Opera, Place du Theatre Francais: Misty Weather
1898

 

 


Claude Monet
Avenue de l'Opera: Morning Sunshine
1898

 

 


Claude Monet
Boulevard Montmartre: Morning, Grey Weather
1897

 

 


Claude Monet
Boulevard Montmartre: Night
1897

 

 


Claude Monet
Boulevard Montmartre: Rainy Weather, Afternoon
1897

 


Claude Monet
Manana de invierno en el boulevard Montmartre

 


Claude Monet
Carnival at the Boulevard des Capucines
1873
Pushkin Museum, Moscow

 

 


Claude Monet
Boulevard des Capucines
1873

 


see collection:
Camille Pissarro
 
 

Discuss Art

Please note: site admin does not answer any questions. This is our readers discussion only.

 
| privacy