|
|
|

|

|
Baroque and Rococo
|
Baroque and Rococo
Art Map |
see collection:
Pieter de Hooch
*
EXPLORATION:
Vermeer
VERMEER
|

|
|
|
Jan Vermeer
born October 31, 1632, Delft, Netherlands
buried December 15, 1675, Delft
Johannes also rendered Jan painter, mainly of interior genre subjects,
who was one of the masters of Dutch art in the 17th century. He had an
unerring grasp of pictorial design and a pure and individual colour
sense. But the most extraordinary element in his art is the unswerving
objectivity with which he recorded the soft play of daylight on varied
shapes and surfaces. His masterpieces include the self-portrait Allegory
of Painting (c. 1665).
Life
Vermeer was born in his family's tavern in the marketplace of Delft, and
he lived his entire life in that city. The city archives indicate that
he married on April 5, 1653, and was enrolled in the artists' guild in
December of that year. That he had some reputation in his lifetime is
indicated by the record left by Balthazar de Monconys, a Frenchman, who
went to Delft especially to see him in 1663. He served as chairman of
the artists' guild in 1662–63 and 1670–71. Further records, however,
indicate his financial difficulties. It appears that he looked
principally to his activities as an art dealer to support his family,
rather than to the sale of his own paintings.
According to the sparse records of this quiet man, Vermeer lived in a
small world of bakers and grocers who accepted his paintings as pawns for
his debts. It was in a shopkeepers' milieu that he conducted his
artistic experiments: these tradesmen of his neighbourhood supplied him
the bread, with its hard and shiny crust, the flowing milk, and the
other bodily nourishments to which he added a spiritual dimension in his
painting, as in his Kitchen-Maid.
Vermeer also depicted Dutch aristocratic and upper-middle-class society,
in which refined ladies read theirmail, do lacework, receive cavaliers,
play music, dabble in philosophy and literature, and entertain in their
salons. The theatre in which these characters appear is a lavish one,
with precious carpets, fine musical instruments, embroidered dresses and
robes, ermine and silk, pearls, and silver cutlery.
Vermeer re-created the figures of Dutch society as wholly devoted to the
weighing of pearls, to poetry and astronomy, to music and geography;
they are heroes of a closed universe, in which gradations of natural and
reflected daylight are rendered with infinite care. His paintings may be
said to depict a refined life, if refinement is understood as a sifting
of reality designed to make it more easily apprehended.
The mystery of Vermeer's life has produced scores of interpretations,
all revealing the same tendency to circumscribe it narrowly. One art
historian, Reginald H. Wilenski, presented him as a laboratory
researcher attempting to broaden the scope of the eye by means of
optical instruments and mirrors. In France, Andre Malraux saw him
enclosed in his family circle and recognized his wife, Catharina Vermeer,
in scores of his characters. Notably, however divergent the views are,
both represented him as a recluse. A close scrutiny of his paintings
also brings to mind the idea of an artist confined to the rooms that he
is depicting, attentive to all the objects separating him from his main
theme but giving no hint whether he considers them obstacles to his
progression or supports in a difficult enterprise. It should be added
here that the two known landscapes by Vermeer were both painted from a
window; it is uncertain whether it was some physical infirmity or
merely the wish to paint with all his supplies at hand that rooted
Vermeer to the stool on which he portrayed himself, seen from the back,
in his Allegory of Painting. The question reveals the paucity of
knowledge of his surpassingly accomplished and hermetic art. It scarcely
influenced either his contemporaries or the painters of later time,
however; its tightly knit texture was enough to discourage whole legions
of artists, and even a major 20th-century counterfeiter of Vermeer did
not dare to imitate his mature works but rather forged works from the
Delft master's unknown youth.
In his own time Vermeer's works seem to have been regarded as
experimental and therefore not widely appreciated. After he died, at the
age of 43, and was buried in the Old Church of Delft, his wife, Catharina,
frantically tried to save 29 of his paintings from the bankruptcy that
was her lot. Vermeer had been ruined by the political troubles and the
wars of the times.
Work
The art of Vermeer expresses a knowledge of matter that is so sensitive
as to be almost scientific. Each painting seems to be the sum of various
analytic experiments with light and with the microscopic observation of
matter, as well as of a specifically pictorial research that frees his
colours from merely rendering forms, that investigates new visual means
of suggesting the rapports between the human presence and its
environment, and that explores bold perspectives that today suggest the
use of wide-angle lenses and telescopic lenses in photography. It is
noteworthy that the rediscovery of Vermeer in the late 19th century
coincided with the interest in the refinement of perception accompanying
the development of photography.
A certain number of paintings attributed to Vermeer are clearly marginal
in respect of his sustained and exceptionally high level of production.
Although unsigned, they cannot be attributed to any other artist. These
works—Diana and Her Companions (c. 1655), Christ in the House of Martha
and Mary (c. 1654–55), the Procuress (1656), and A Girl Asleep—are
assumed to be works in which Vermeer conducted his earliest
investigations.
Elements such as colour treatment, the perspective, the analysis of some
objects, although not conclusive in themselves, unmistakably relate them
to the Delft master's greatest works, next to which they become unified
and attuned. In his next stage, the great painter acceded to the levels
at which art is the absolute master of subject matter; he assumed a
gradually fuller possession of reality. Neither distance nor shade
attenuated the perception of every element in the paintings. Vermeer
even went so far as to indicate the time on the clock—7:10 AM—in a
celebrated View of Delft. At this level of perfection, it is difficult to
establish a clear progression among the various paintings. There are some
works of exceptional power and others that are less accomplished. Some
may even reveal a side of the painter not particularly noticed before:
Allegory of the Faith, for example, is of an unexpected symbolical
complexity. One composition that seems to surpass all the rest is the
Allegory of Painting, which was long attributed to Pieter de Hooch.
Since the authenticity of the dates on his paintings is generally
considered to be doubtful, the chronology of Vermeer's sparse production
is almost impossible to determine. Within the assemblage of his greatest
paintings, it is impossible to determine that one is an improvement over
another. The traditional rule of art historians is that the more complex
compositions are created later in the artist's career. Accordingly, the
Allegory of the Faith and the Allegory of Painting should represent the
painter's ultimate accomplishments. But Vermeer is just as faithful to
himself in such simpler compositions as the Head of a Young Girl or The
Girl in a Red Hat, not to mention his landscapes. Young Woman Reading a
Letter, sometimes known as Woman in Blue, and The Kitchen-Maid are
simpler and therefore inferably earlier than those compositions in which
there is a wealth of symbolic elements, but the simpler works are also
bolder in experimentation, which is traditionally an indication of a
later work.
Vermeer somehow manages to be unique within a typically Dutch genre. He
withstood all of the Italian, the French, and the Flemish influences
that are sensed in the work of other Dutch artists of his time. Whereas
Frans Hals seems at times to converse with the Spaniard Velázquez, for
example, and Rembrandt with the Italian Baroque painter Guercino,
Vermeer is preoccupied with a wholly personal direction unlike any
other. Vermeer is typically Dutch, however, in his way of “planning”
reality, of analyzing it thoroughly. It is reminiscent of the rigorous
methods of the Dutch hydraulic engineers in their conquests over
marshland and sea or of the astronomer Huygens discovering the rings
girding Saturn.
Despite their unique denseness and clarity, all of Vermeer's works were
attributed to others until, in 1866, the art historian Theophile Thore
(pseudonym of W. Burger), who rediscovered him, attributed 76 paintings
to him. Two years later, this number was reduced by another scholar to
56. By 1907, the number was reduced to 34, and it remains between 30 and
35, depending on the authority.
An attempt in 1937 to create a chronology of his works brought the
authorities into heated controversy with each other. The matter was
greatly complicated when a forger, Han van Meegeren, in 1945
demonstrated that he had painted works that had been attributed by the
greatest connoisseurs to Vermeer's early period. Insofar as Vermeer
studies are concerned, the art world has not yet recovered from that
hoax.
Pierre Descargues
|
_____________
_____________
|
"It is true that in the few
pictures he painted,
one can find the entire scale of colours;
but the use of lemon yellow, pale blue and
light grey together is as characteristic of him
as the harmony of black, white, grey and pink
is of Velazquez."
Vincent van Gogh
1888
|
Leitmotifs in Vermeer's Art
|
* * *
Important leitmotif
White porcelain jugs appear repeatedly in Vermeer's art.
They
contained wine, which was supposed to act as a love potion
and help
men seduce women.
|

Vermeer Woman and Two Men (detail)
|

Vermeer The Music Lesson (detail)
|
|
|

Vermeer
Girl Asleep at a Table (detail)
|

Vermeer
The Glass of Wine (detail)
|
|
* * *
|
A warning
The above detail in the window appears in both The
Glass of Wine and Woman and Two Men.
It is an image of
Temperance, and was intended to act as a warning to the people
in the painting.
|

Vermeer
The Glass of Wine (detail)
|

Vermeer
Woman and Two Men (detail)
|
|
* * *
|
Maps of the Netherlands
Vermeer's love of maps becomes apparent in the way he decorates his
interiors. The role of maps was twofold: on the one hand, they
indicated wealth (in the seventeenth century, maps were an expensive
luxury); on the other hand, they refer to a good level of education.
Cartography was still a new science, but was beginning to be held in
high regard.
|

Vermeer
The Art of Painting (detail)
|

Vermeer
Soldier and a Laughing Girl
c. 1658
|
 Vermeer Woman in Blue Reading a Letter (detail)
|
|
|

Vermeer
Woman Playing a Lute near a Window
|

Vermeer
Woman with a Water Jug (detail)
|
|
* * *
|
Painting within a painting
Vermeer repeatedly gives us hints as to how we should interpret his
paintings.
For instance, the cupid holding the playing card in this painting within
a painting raises doubts as to the virginity of the woman at the virginal.
|

Vermeer
The Concert (detail)
|

Vermeer
The Glass of Wine (detail)
|
 Vermeer
Woman and Two Men (detail)
|

Vermeer The Music Lesson (detail)
|

Vermeer
Allegory of Faith (detail)
|

Vermeer
Lady Seated at a Virginal (detail)
|
|
|

Vermeer
The Guitar Player (detail)
|

Vermeer
Woman Weighing Pearls (detail)
|
|
|

Vermeer
Lady Writing a Letter with Her Maid (detail)
|
 Vermeer
The Love Letter (detail)
|
|
|
|

Vermeer
Lady Standing at a Virginal (detail)
|
_____________
_____________
|
Everyday Scenes
Transformed Into Poetry
The calm and peace of a great master
|
|
We would need an entire book if we wanted
to describe the art of painting. It ought to be
presented to us in the guise of a beautiful
young female with curly black hair and
her mouth bound, wearing a gold chain
about her neck from which a larva dangles.
In one hand she is holding several brushes
and the motto: Imitatio- that is, imitation.
Cesare Ripa, Iconologia, 1593
|

Vermeer
The Allegory of Painting
1667
|
The Muses, the daughters of Zeus and the Titaness Mnemosyne,
bear resounding names: Calliope ("fair voice"), Euterpe
("gladness"), Terpsichore ("joy in the dance"), Erato
("lovely"), Melpomene ("singing"), Thalia ("abundance" or "good
cheer"), Polymnia ("many songs") and Urania ("heavenly"). These
sisters were regarded by the ancient Greeks as the goddesses of
the fine arts, music and literature. As ancient mythology has
it, they lived on Mt Parnassus, a barren limestone spur of the
Pindus Mountains m central Greece. On its southern slopes the
Delphic oracle of Apollo prophesied in riddles. A consensus was
never reached as to the domains over which the individual Muses
presided, nevertheless, certain art forms came to be associated
with each of them, although some overlapped: poetry and
flute-playing, song and dance, comedy and tragedy, pantomime and
even the science of astronomy. Yet, painting remained amongst
the fields of art to be ignored entirely.
The Dutch painter Jan Vermeer van Delft was surely not
the first painter to have felt slighted by his art being thus
overlooked. However, he was one of the few to feel that he ought
to do something about this sorry state of affairs. In short, he
took the ninth muse, Clio, as his personal patron. Clio presided
over history. Why did Vermeer take this particular Muse
as his own and not the poetic allegory proposed by the Italian
writer Cesare Ripa, who was widely read in Vermeer s day? Like
many of his contemporaries, Vermeer probably saw history
painting with a mythological background — the representation of
biblical and allegorical scenes — as the major genre in
painting. In his Allegory of Painting, Vermeer
portrayed Clio as a young girl holding a history book in one
hand and a trumpet proclaiming fame in the other.
The artist does not seem to have been inspired by his particular
Muse all that often.
The man from Delft most likely painted only the thirty-four
works that are known. Was Vermeer, in fact, a painter by
profession? He is said to have inherited the Mechelen Tavern on
the north side of the Delft marketplace from his father in 1652.
Later the story goes that he worked as an art dealer. Even that
was obviously not enough to keep him financially secure. When
Vermeer, who today stands beside Frans Hals and
Rembrandt as the most famous seventeenth-century Dutch
painter, died in 1675, he left behind eight young children and a
destitute widow. One of the first things she did was to give the
Delft master-baker Hendrick van Buyten two paintings by her late
husband to discharge debts amounting to 617 guilders and 6
stivers.
K.Reichold, B. Graf
|
|
EXPLORATION:
Vermeer
("Veiled Emotions" by Norbert
Schneider)
*
see collection:
Pieter de Hooch
|
|
|
 |
|