Leonardo da Vinci - biography
(Encyclopaedia Britannica)
Italian painter, draftsman, sculptor, architect, and engineer whose
genius, perhaps more than that of any figure, epitomized the
Renaissance humanist ideal. His "Last Supper" (1495-97) and "Mona
Lisa" (1503-06) are among the most widely popular and influential
paintings of the Renaissance. His notebooks reveal a spirit of
scientific inquiry and a mechanical inventiveness that were
centuries ahead of their time.
The unique
fame that Leonardo enjoyed in his lifetime and that, filtered and
purified by historical criticism, has remained undimmed to the
present day is based on the equally unique universality of his
spirit. Leonardo's universality is more than many-sidedness. True,
at the time of the Renaissance and the period of humanism,
many-sidedness was a highly esteemed quality; but it was by no means
rare. Many other good artists possessed it. Leonardo's universality,
on the other hand, was a spiritual force, peculiarly his own, that
generated in him an unlimited desire for knowledge and guided
his thinking and behaviour. An artist by disposition and endowment,
he found that his eyes were his main avenue to knowledge; to
Leonardo, sight was man's highest sense organ because sight alone
conveyed the facts of experience immediately, correctly, and with
certainty. Hence, every phenomenon perceived became an object of
knowledge. Saper vedere ("knowing how to see") became the great
theme of his studies of man's works and nature's creations. His
creativity reached out into every realm in which graphic
representation is used: he was painter, sculptor, architect, and
engineer. But he went even beyond that. His superb intellect, his
unusual powers of observation, and his mastery of the art of drawing
led him to the study of nature itself, which he pursued with method
and penetrating logic--and in which his art and his science were
equally revealed.
Life
and works
Early
period: Florence
The illegitimate son
of Ser Piero, a Florentine notary and landlord, Leonardo was born on
his father's family estate. His mother, Caterina, was a young
peasant woman who shortly thereafter married an artisan from that
region. Not until his third and fourth marriages did Ser Piero's
wives have children, the first one in 1476, when Leonardo was
already an adult. Thus, Leonardo grew up in his father's house,
where he was treated as a legitimate son and received the usual
elementary education of that day: reading, writing, and arithmetic.
As for Latin, the key language of traditional learning, Leonardo did
not seriously study it until much later, when he acquired a working
knowledge of it on his own. Not until he was 30 years old did he
apply himself to higher mathematics--advanced geometry and
arithmetic--which he studied with diligent tenacity; but here, too,
he did not get much beyond the beginning stages.
Leonardo's artistic
inclinations must have appeared early. When he was about 15, his
father, who enjoyed a high reputation in the Florence community,
apprenticed him to Andrea del Verrocchio. In Verrocchio's renowned
workshop Leonardo received a many-sided training that included not
only painting and sculpture but the technical-mechanical arts as
well. He also worked in the next-door workshop of Antonio Pollaiuolo,
where he was probably first drawn to the study of anatomy. In 1472
Leonardo was accepted in the painters' guild of Florence but
remained five years more in his teacher's workshop. Then he worked
independently in Florence until 1481. In the few extant works of
this early period one may clearly trace the development of the
artist's remarkable talent. Keenness of observation and creative
imagination stand out. His early mastery is revealed in an angel and
a segment of landscape executed by him in Verrocchio's painting the
"Baptism of Christ" (Uffizi, Florence) and in two Annunciations
(Uffizi, as well as the Louvre, Paris), both of them done in
Verrocchio's workshop, as were the "Madonna with the Carnation," the
"Madonna Benois," and the "Portrait of Ginevra de' Benci." This
mastery reached its peak in two paintings that remained unfinished:
"St. Jerome" and a large panel painting of "The Adoration of the
Magi." In addition to these few paintings there are a great many
superb pen and pencil drawings, in which Leonardo's mastery blazed
new trails for this graphic art. Among the drawings are many
technical sketches--for example, pumps, military weapons, mechanical
apparatus--evidence of Leonardo's interest in and knowledge of
technical matters at the outset of his career.
Unfolding of Leonardo's genius: first Milanese period (1482-99)
In 1482 Leonardo
entered the service of the Duke of Milan--a surprising step when one
realizes that the 30-year-old artist had just received his first
substantial commissions from his native city of Florence: the
above-mentioned unfinished panel painting of "The Adoration of the
Magi" for the monastery of S. Donato a Scopeto (1481) and an altar
painting for the St. Bernard Chapel in the Palazzo della Signoria,
which was never fulfilled. That he gave up both projects despite the
commitments he had undertaken--not even starting on the second
named--seems to indicate deeper reasons for his leaving Florence. It
may have been that the rather sophisticated spirit of Neoplatonism
prevailing in the Florence of the Medici went against the grain of
his experience-oriented mind and that the more realistic academic
atmosphere of Milan attracted him. Moreover, there was the
fascination of Ludovico Sforza's brilliant court and the meaningful
projects awaiting him there.
Leonardo spent 17 years in
Milan, until Ludovico's fall from power in 1499. He was listed in
the register of the royal household as pictor et ingeniarius ducalis
("painter and engineer of the duke"). Highly esteemed, Leonardo was
constantly kept busy as a painter and sculptor and as a designer of
court festivals. He was also frequently consulted as a technical
adviser in the fields of architecture, fortifications, and military
matters, and he served as a hydraulic and mechanical engineer.
In this phase of his life Leonardo's genius unfolded to the full, in
all its versatility and creatively powerful artistic and scientific
thought, achieving that quality of uniqueness that called forth the
awe and astonished admiration of his contemporaries. At the same
time, in the boundlessness of the goals he set himself, Leonardo's
genius bore the mark of the unattainable so that, if one traces the
outlines of his lifework as a whole, one is tempted to call it a
grandiose "unfinished symphony."
Painting and sculpture
As a painter
Leonardo completed only six works in the 17 years in Milan:
portraits of Cecilia Gallerani ("Lady with an Ermine") and a
musician, an altar painting of "The Virgin of the Rocks" (two
versions), a monumental wall painting of the "Last Supper" in the
refectory of the monastery of Sta. Maria delle Grazie (1495-97), and
the decorative ceiling painting of the Sala delle Asse in the Milan
Castello Sforzesco (1498). Three other pictures that, according to
old sources, Leonardo was commissioned to do have disappeared or
were never done: a "Nativity" said to have belonged to Emperor
Maximilian; a "Madonna" that Ludovico Sforza announced as a gift to
the Hungarian king Matthias Corvinus; and the portrait of one of
Ludovico's mistresses, Lucrezia Crivelli.
Also unfinished was a grandiose sculptural project that seems to
have been the real reason Leonardo was invited to Milan: a
monumental equestrian statue in bronze to be
erected in honour of Francesco Sforza, the founder of the Sforza
dynasty. Leonardo devoted 12 years--with interruptions--to this
task. Many sketches of it exist, the most impressive ones discovered
only in the mid-20th century, when two of Leonardo's notebooks came
to light again in Madrid. They reveal the sublimity but also the
almost unreal boldness of his conception. In 1493 the clay model of
the horse was put on open display on the occasion of the marriage of
Emperor Maximilian with Bianca Maria Sforza, and preparations were
made to cast the colossal figure, which was to be
16 feet (five metres) high--double the size of Verrocchio's
equestrian statue of Bartolomeo Colleoni! But, because of the
imminent danger of war, the metal, ready to be poured, was used for
cannon instead, and so the project came to a halt. Ludovico's fall
in 1499 sealed the fate of this abortive undertaking, which was
perhaps the grandest concept of a monument in the 15th century. The
ravages of war left the clay model a heap of ruins.
As a master artist Leonardo maintained an extensive workshop in
Milan, employing apprentices and students. The role of most of these
associates is unclear. Their activity involves the question of
Leonardo's so-called apocryphal works, in which the master
collaborated with his assistants. Scholars have been unable to agree
in their attributions of these works, which include such paintings
as "La Belle Ferronniиre" in the Louvre, the so-called "Lucrezia
Crivelli" in the Pinacoteca Ambrosiana, Milan, and the "Madonna
Litta" in the Hermitage, St. Petersburg (formerly Leningrad). Among
Leonardo's pupils at this time were Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio,
Ambrogio de Predis, Bernardino de' Conti, Francesco Napoletano,
Andrea Solari, Marco d'Oggiono, and Salai.
Art
and science: the notebooks
The Milan years also
saw Leonardo's decided turn toward scientific studies. He began to
pursue these systematically and with such intensity that they
demanded more and more of his time and energy and developed into an
independent realm of creative productivity. Within him there arose
now a growing need to note and write down in literary form every one
of his perceptions and experiences. It is a unique phenomenon in the
history of art. Undoubtedly, the several treatises on art that
appeared or were made available during those decades provided an
external stimulus. Leon Battista Alberti's De re aedificatoria (Ten
Books on Architecture) was first printed in 1485; Francesco di
Giorgio's treatise on architecture was available in its first
manuscript versions, and Leonardo had received a copy from the
author as a gift. Moreover, Piero della Francesca in his De
prospectiva pingendi ("On Perspective in Painting") had provided for
his contemporaries a model text on the theory of perspective.
Finally, there was the mathematician Lucas Pacioli, who had become
an acquaintance of Leonardo's. In 1494 Pacioli published his Summa
de arithmetica geometria proportioni et proportional itа, followed
by his Divina proportione ("On Divine Proportion"), for which
Leonardo drew figures of symmetrical bodies.
In this ambience Leonardo began to nourish the desire to write a
theory of art of his own, and there arose in him the far-reaching
concept of a "science of painting." Alberti and Piero della
Francesca had already offered proof of the mathematical basis of
painting in their analysis of the laws of perspective and proportion
and thereby buttressed painting's claim to being a science. But
Leonardo's claims went much further. Proceeding from the basic
conviction that sight is the human being's most unerring sense
organ, yielding immediate, accurate, and reliable data of
experience, Leonardo--equating "seeing" with "perceiving"--arrived
at a bold conclusion: the painter, doubly endowed with subtle powers
of perception and the complete ability to pictorialize them, was the
prime person qualified to achieve knowledge by observing and to
reproduce that knowledge authentically in a pictorial manner. Hence,
Leonardo conceived the staggering plan of observing all objects in
the visible world, recognizing their form and structure, and
pictorially describing them exactly as they are. Thus, drawing
became the chief instrument of his didactic method.
In the years between 1490 and 1495 the great program of Leonardo the
writer (author of treatises) began. In it, four main themes, which
were to occupy him for the rest of his life, could be discerned and
gradually took shape: a treatise on painting, a treatise on
architecture, a book on the elements of mechanics, and a broadly
outlined work on human anatomy. His geophysical, botanical,
hydrological, and aerological researches also belong to this period
and constitute parts of the "visible cosmology" that loomed before
Leonardo as a distant goal. Against speculative book knowledge,
which he scorned, he set irrefutable facts gained from
experience--from saper vedere.
All these studies and sketches were written down in Leonardo's
notebooks and on individual sheets of paper. Altogether they add up
to thousands of closely written pages abundantly illustrated with
sketches--the most voluminous literary legacy any painter has ever
left behind. Of more than 40 codices mentioned in the older
sources--often, of course, rather inaccurately--21 have survived;
these in turn sometimes contain notebooks originally separate and
now bound together so that 31 in all have been preserved. To these
should be added several large bundles of documents: an omnibus
volume in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana, Milan, called Codex Atlanticus
because of its size, was collected by the sculptor Pompeo Leoni at
the end of the 16th century; its sister volume, after a roundabout
journey, fell into the possession of the English crown and was
placed in the Royal Library, Windsor Castle. Finally there is the
Arundel Manuscript (British Museum, MS. 263), which contains a
number of Leonardo's fascicles on various themes.
It was during his years in Milan that Leonardo began the earliest of
these notebooks. He would first make quick sketches of his
observations on loose sheets or on tiny paper pads he kept in his
belt; then he would arrange them according to theme and enter them
in order in the notebook. Surviving are a first collection of
material for the painting treatise (MSS. A and B in the Institut de
France, Paris), a model book of sketches for sacred and profane
architecture (MS. B, Institut de France, Paris), the treatise on
elementary theory of mechanics (MS. 8937, Biblioteca Nacional,
Madrid), and the first sections of a treatise on the human body
(Anatomical MS. B; Windsor Castle, Royal Library).
Two special features make Leonardo's notes and sketches unusual: his
use of mirror writing and the relationship between word and picture.
Leonardo was left-handed; so mirror writing came easily and
naturally to him. It should not be looked upon as a secret
handwriting. Though somewhat unusual, his script can be read clearly
and without difficulty with the help of a mirror--as his
contemporaries testified. But the fact that Leonardo used mirror
writing throughout, even in his fair copies drawn up with
painstaking calligraphy, forces one to conclude that, although he
constantly addressed an imaginary reader in his writings, he never
felt the need to achieve easy communication by using conventional
handwriting. Yet occasional examples of normal handwriting (drafts
of letters, notes, and comments to be submitted to third parties)
show that Leonardo was completely at home in it. In the overwhelming
majority of his notes in mirror writing, therefore, one gets the
strong impression of "monologues in writing." Finally, then, his
writings must be interpreted as preliminary stages of works destined
for eventual publication, which Leonardo never got around to
completing. In a sentence in the margin of one of his late anatomy
sketches, he implores his followers to see that his works are
printed.
The second unusual feature in Leonardo's writings is the new
function given to illustration vis-а-vis the text. Leonardo strove
passionately for a language that was clear yet expressive. The
vividness and wealth of his vocabulary were the result of intense
self-study and represented a significant contribution to the
evolution of scientific prose in the Italian vernacular. On the
other hand, in his teaching method Leonardo gave absolute precedence
to the illustration over the written word; hence, the drawing does
not illustrate the text; rather, the text serves to explain the
picture. In formulating his own principle of graphic
representation--which he himself called dimostrazione
("demonstrations")--Leonardo was a precursor of modern scientific
illustration.
Thus, during Leonardo's years in Milan the two "action fields"--the
artistic and the scientific--developed and shaped his future
creativity. It was a kind of "creative dualism," with mutual
encouragement but also mutual pressure from each field.
Second Florentine period (1500-06)
In December 1499 or at the latest
January 1500--three months after the victorious entry of the French
into Milan--Leonardo left that city in the company of Lucas Pacioli.
He stopped first at Mantua, where, in February 1500, he drew a
portrait of his hostess, Marchioness Isabella d'Este, and then
proceeded to Venice (in March), where the Signoria (governing
council) sought his advice on how to ward off a threatened Turkish
incursion in Friuli. Leonardo recommended that they prepare to flood
the menaced region. From Venice he returned to Florence, where,
after a long absence, he was received with
acclaim and honoured as a renowned native son. In that same year he
was appointed an architectural expert to a committee investigating
damages to the foundation and structure of the church of S.
Francesco al Monte. A guest of the Servite order in the cloister of
SS. Annunziata, Leonardo began there a cartoon for a painting of the
"Virgin and Child with St. Anne," the composition of which won
admiration from artists and art lovers of the city. He also painted
(1501) a "Madonna with the Yarn-Winder," which has survived only in
copies and which he probably never finished. Mathematical studies
seem to have kept him away from his painting activity much of the
time, or so Isabella d'Este, who sought in vain to obtain a painting
done by him, was informed by Fra Pietro Nuvolaria, her
representative in Florence.
Only his omnivorous "appetite for
life" can explain Leonardo's decision, in the summer of the
following year (1502), to leave Florence and enter the service of
Cesare Borgia as "senior military architect and general engineer."
Borgia, the notorious son of Pope Alexander VI, had, as commander in
chief of the papal army, sought with unexampled ruthlessness to gain
control of the Papal States of Romagna and the Marches. Now he was
at the peak of his power and, at 27, was undoubtedly the most
compelling and at the same time most feared person of his time.
Leonardo, twice his age, must have been fascinated by his
personality. For 10 months he travelled across the condottiere's
territories and surveyed them. In the course of his activity
Leonardo sketched some of the city plans and topographical maps that
laid the groundwork for modern cartography. At the court of Cesare
Borgia, Leonardo also met Niccolт Machiavelli, temporarily stationed
there as a political observer for the city of Florence.
In the spring of 1503 Leonardo
returned to Florence to make an expert survey of a project for
diverting the Arno River behind Pisa so that the city, then under
siege by the Florentines, would be deprived of access to the sea.
The plan proved unworkable, but Leonardo's activity led him to a
much more significant theme, one that served peace rather than war;
the project, first advanced in the 13th century and now again under
consideration, was to build a large canal that would bypass the
unnavigable stretch of the Arno and connect Florence by water with
the sea. Leonardo developed his ideas in a series of studies; with
panoramic views of the river bank, which are also landscape sketches
of great artistic charm, and with exact measurements of the terrain,
he produced a map in which the route of the canal (with its transit
through the mountain pass of Serravalle) was shown. The project,
considered time and again in subsequent centuries, was never carried
out, but centuries later the express highway from Florence to the
sea was built over the exact route Leonardo chose for his canal.
That same year (1503), however, Leonardo also received a prized
commission: to paint a mural for the Hall of the Five Hundred in
Florence's Palazzo Vecchio; a historical scene of monumental
proportions . For three years he worked on this "Battle of Anghiari";
like its intended complementary painting, Michelangelo's "Battle of
Cascina," it remained unfinished. But the cartoon and the copies
showing the main scene of the battle, the fight for the standard,
were for a long time, to quote the sculptor Benvenuto Cellini, "the
school of the world." These same years saw the portrait of "Mona
Lisa" and a painting of a standing "Leda," which was not completed
and has survived only in copies.
The Florentine
period was also, however, a time of intensive scientific study;
Leonardo did dissections in the hospital of Sta. Maria Nuova and
broadened his anatomical work into a comprehensive study of the
structure and function of the human organism. He made systematic
observations of the flight of birds, concerning which he planned a
treatise. Even his hydrological studies, "on the nature and movement
of water," broadened into research on the physical properties of
water, especially the laws of currents, which he compared with those
pertaining to air. These were also set down in his own collection of
data, contained in the so-called Leicester Codex in Holkham Hall,
Norfolk, England.
Second Milanese period (1506-13)
Thus, during these years in
Florence, Leonardo's productivity was also marked by his "creative
dualism." Only sporadically did he work at his paintings. When, in
May 1506, Charles d'Amboise, governor of the King of France in
Milan, asked and was granted permission by the Signoria in Florence
for Leonardo to go for a time to Milan, the artist had no hesitation
about accepting the invitation. But what was originally a limited
period of time became a permanent move under the stress of political
circumstances. Florence let Leonardo go, and the monumental "Battle
of Anghiari" remained unfinished. Unsuccessful technical experiments
with paints seem to have impelled Leonardo to stop working on the
mural. One cannot otherwise explain his abandonment of this great
work--great both in conception and in realization.
Leonardo spent six years in Milan,
interrupted only by a six-month stay in Florence in the winter of
1507-08, where he helped the sculptor Giovanni Francesco Rustici
execute his bronze statues for the Florence Baptistery but did not
resume work on the "Battle
of Anghiari." Honoured and admired by his patrons Charles
d'Amboise and King Louis XII, who gave him a yearly stipend of 400
ducats, Leonardo never found his duties onerous. They were limited
to advice in architectural matters, tangible evidence of which are
plans for a palace-villa for Charles d'Amboise and perhaps also
sketches for an oratory for the church of Sta. Maria alla Fontana,
which Charles funded. Leonardo also looked into an old project
revived by the French governor: the Adda canal that would link Milan
with Lake Como by water.
In Milan he did very little as a
painter: two Madonnas, which he promised the King of France, were
never painted. He continued to work on the paintings of the "Virgin
and Child with St. Anne" and "Leda," which he had brought with him
from Florence, as copies from the Lombard school of that period
attest. Again Leonardo gathered pupils around him. With Ambrogio de
Predis he completed a second version of "The Virgin of the Rocks"
(1508), in the course of which protracted litigation between the
purchasers and the artists had a happy ending. Of his older
disciples, Bernardino de' Conti and Salai were again in his studio;
new pupils came, among them Cesare da Sesto, Giampetrino, Bernardino
Luini, and the young nobleman Francesco Melzi, Leonardo's most
faithful friend and companion until his death.
An important commission in
sculpture came his way. Gian Giacomo Trivulzio had returned
victoriously to Milan as marshal of the French army and a bitter foe
of Ludovico Sforza. He commissioned Leonardo to sculpt his tomb,
which was to take the form of an equestrian statue and be placed in
the mortuary chapel donated by Trivulzio to the church of S. Nazaro
Maggiore. But after years of preparatory work on the monument, for
which a number of significant sketches have survived,
the Marshal himself gave up the plan in favour of a more modest one;
so this undertaking, too, remained unfinished. Leonardo must have
felt keenly this second disappointment in his work as a sculptor.
Compared with his almost cursory
work in art, Leonardo's scientific activity flourished. His studies
in anatomy achieved a new dimension in his collaboration with a
famous anatomist from Pavia, Marcantonio della Torre. He outlined a
plan for an overall work that would include not only exact, detailed
reproductions of the human body and its organs but would also
include comparative anatomy and the whole field of physiology. He
even thought he would finish his anatomical manuscript in the winter
of 1510-11. Beyond that, his manuscripts are replete with
mathematical, optical, mechanical, geological, and botanical studies
that must be understood as data for his "perceptual cosmology." This
became increasingly actuated by a central idea: the conviction that
force and motion as basic mechanical functions produce all outward
forms in organic and inorganic nature and give them their shape and,
furthermore, the recognition that these functioning forces operate
in accordance with orderly, harmonious laws.
Last
years (1513-19)
In 1513
political events--the temporary ouster of the French from
Milan--caused the now 60-year-old Leonardo to move again. At the end
of the year he went to Rome, accompanied by his pupils Melzi and
Salai as well as by two studio assistants, hoping to find employment
there through his patron, Giuliano de' Medici, brother of the new
pope Leo X. Giuliano gave him a suite of rooms in his residence, the
Belvedere, in the Vatican. He also gave him a considerable monthly
stipend, but no large commissions came to him. For three years
Leonardo remained in the Eternal City, off to one side, while Donato
Bramante was building St. Peter's, Raphael was painting the last
rooms of the Pope's new apartments, Michelangelo was struggling to
complete the tomb of Pope Julius, and many younger artists such as
Peruzzi, Timoteo Viti, and Sodoma were active there. Drafts of
embittered letters betray the disappointment of the aging master who
worked in his studio on mathematical studies and technical
experiments or, strolling through the city, surveyed ancient
monuments. A magnificently executed map of the Pontine Marshes
(Royal Library, Windsor Castle; 12684) suggests that Leonardo was at
least a consultant for a reclamation project that Giuliano de'
Medici ordered in 1514. On the other hand, there were sketches for a
spacious residence for the Medici in Florence, who had returned to
power there in 1512. But this did not go beyond the stage of
preliminary sketches and never came to pass. Leonardo seems to have
resumed his friendship with Bramante, but the latter died in 1514.
And there is no record of Leonardo's relations with any other
artists in Rome.
In a life of
such loneliness, it is easy to understand why Leonardo, despite his
65 years, decided to accept the invitation of the young king Francis
I to enter his service in France. At the end of 1516 he left Italy
forever, together with his most devoted pupil, Francesco Melzi.
Leonardo spent the last three years of his life in the small
residence of Cloux (later called Clos-Lucй), near the King's summer
palace at Amboise on the Loire. Premier peintre, architecte et
mйchanicien du Roi ("first painter, architect, and mechanic of the
King") was the proud title he bore; yet the admiring King left him
complete freedom of action. He did no more painting or at most
completed the painting of the enigmatic, mystical "St. John the
Baptist," which the Cardinal of Aragon, when he visited Amboise, saw
in Leonardo's studio along with the "Mona Lisa" and the "Virgin and
Child with St. Anne."
For the King
he drew up plans for the palace and garden of Romorantin, destined
to be the widow's residence of the Queen Mother. But the carefully
worked-out project, combining the best features of Italian-French
traditions in palace and landscape architecture, had to be halted
because the region was threatened with malaria.
Leonardo still
made sketches for court festivals, but the King treated him in every
respect as an honoured guest. Decades later, Francis I talked with
the sculptor Benvenuto Cellini about Leonardo in terms of the utmost
admiration and esteem. Leonardo spent most of his time arranging and
editing his scientific studies. The final drafts for his treatise on
painting and a few pages of the anatomy appeared. Consummate
drawings such as the "Floating Figure" (Royal Library, Windsor
Castle; 12581) are the final testimonials to his undiminished
genius. In the so-called "Visions of the End of the World," or
"Deluge" (Royal Library, Windsor Castle), he depicts with
overpowering pictorial imagination the primal forces that rule
nature.
Leonardo died
at Cloux. He was laid to rest in the palace church of Saint-Florentin.
But the church was devastated during the French Revolution and
completely torn down at the beginning of the 19th century. Hence,
his grave can no longer be located. Francesco Melzi fell heir to his
artistic and scientific estate.
Analysis and evaluation of Leonardo's achievement
Painting
Leonardo's
total output in painting is really not large; only 17 of the
paintings that have survived can be definitely attributed to him,
and several of them are unfinished. Two of his most important
works--the "Battle of Anghiari" and the "Leda," neither of them
completed--have only survived in copies. Yet these few creations
have established the unique fame of a man whom Vasari, in his Lives,
dividing art history into three ages, placed in the last "golden age
of the arts." His works, unaffected by all the vicissitudes of
aesthetic doctrines in subsequent centuries, have stood out in all
periods and all countries as consummate masterpieces of painting.
The many
testimonials to Leonardo, ranging from Vasari to Peter Paul Rubens,
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, and Eugиne Delacroix, make it
unmistakably clear that it has been, above all, Leonardo's art of
expression that has called forth the utmost admiration. It is, in
fact, the core of his formation as a painter--from his earliest
beginnings to his last work. This expression was nurtured by his
power of invention but also by every technical
means: drawing, colour, use of light and shadow. To Leonardo,
expression became a key concept of art; it also included the basic
demands of truth, beauty, and accuracy in everything depicted.
What Leonardo
was striving for was already revealed in his angel in Verrocchio's
"Baptism of Christ" (c. 1474-75): in the natural structuring of the
angel's body based on movement in several directions, in the
relaxation of his attitude, and in his glance, which takes in what
is occurring but at the same time is directed inward. In his
landscape segment in the same picture, Leonardo also found a new
expression for "nature experienced," in reproducing the forms he
perceived as if through a veil of mist. The landscape study (Uffizi,
Florence) dated 1473, a pen drawing, foreshadows in its treatment of
transparent atmosphere by a 21-year-old his telling ability to
transform perceived phenomena into convincing graphic forms.
In the
"Madonna Benois" (1478) Leonardo succeeded in giving an old
traditional type of picture a new, unusually charming, and
expressive mood by showing the child Jesus reaching for the flower
in Mary's hand in a sweet and tender manner.
His "Portrait
of Ginevra de' Benci" (c. 1475-78) opened new paths for portrait
painting with his singular linking of nearness and distance.
The emaciated
body of his "St. Jerome" (c. 1480) is presented with realistic truth
based on his sober and objective studies in anatomy; gesture and
look give Jerome an unrivalled expression of transfigured sorrow.
The interplay
of mimicry and gesture--"physical and spiritual motion," in
Leonardo's words--is also the chief concern of his first large
creation containing many figures, "The Adoration of the Magi"
(1481). Never finished, the painting nevertheless affords rich
insight into the master's subtle methods of work. The various
aspects of the scene are "built up" from the base with very
delicate, paper-thin layers of paint in chiaroscuro (the balance of
light and shadow) relief. The main treatment of the Virgin and Child
group and the secondary treatment of the surrounding groups are
clearly set apart with a masterful sense of composition; yet
thematically they are closely interconnected: the bearing and
expression of the figures--most striking in the group of praying
shepherds--depict all degrees and levels of profound amazement. "The
Virgin of the Rocks" in its first version in the Louvre is the work
that reveals Leonardo's painting art at its purest. The painting,
according to Leonardo's first contract with the Confraternity of the
Immaculate Conception, was to be the central panel of a large work
for their chapel in the church of S. Francesco and was done in the
years c. 1483-85. It never arrived, however, at the place it was
originally destined for. It seems to have been prematurely taken
from the Confraternity, perhaps by some highly placed interested
party who removed it from Leonardo's workshop. Instead of this first
painting, Leonardo and Ambrogio de Predis painted a second, slightly
revised version, probably begun around 1494. This one gave rise to a
10-year litigation between the artist and the Confraternity
regarding the price, a dispute that was not
settled until 1506 in favour of Leonardo; whereupon, two years
later, the painting was delivered as per contract. This second
version remained in the chapel of S. Francesco until the
Confraternity was dissolved (1781), and then, after changing owners
frequently, it came finally in 1880 to the National Gallery in
London.
"The Virgin of
the Rocks" depicts the apocryphal legend of the meeting in the
wilderness between the boy John and the equally young Jesus
returning home from Egypt. Leonardo's artistry makes of this theme a
vision that the true believer experiences when he contemplates the
devotional picture. In the visionary character of the picture lies
the secret of its effect: it presents not a "reality" but a
"manifestation." Leonardo uses every artistic means at his disposal
to emphasize the visionary nature of the scene.
The soft colour tones (his famous sfumato), the dim light of the
cave from which the figures emerge bathed in light, their quiet
attitude, the meaningful gesture with which the angel (the only one
facing the viewer) points to John as the intercessor between the Son
of God and humanity--all this combines, in a patterned and formal
way, to achieve an effect of the highest expressiveness.
The
"Last Supper"
Leonardo's "Last Supper" is among the most famous paintings in
the world. In its monumental simplicity, the composition of the
scene is masterful; the power of its effect comes from the striking
contrast in the attitudes of the 12 disciples as counterposed to
Christ. Leonardo did not choose the portrayal of the traitor Judas
customary in the iconographic tradition; he portrayed, rather, that
moment of highest tension as related in the New Testament, "One of
you which eateth with me will betray me." All of the Apostles--as
human beings who do not understand what is about to occur--are
agitated, whereas Christ alone, conscious of his divine mission,
sits in lonely, transfigured serenity. Only one other being shares
the secret knowledge: Judas, who is both part of and yet excluded
from the movement of his companions; in this isolation he becomes
the second lonely figure--the guilty one--of the company.
In the
profound conception of his theme, in the perfect yet seemingly
simple arrangement of the individuals, in the temperaments of the
Apostles highlighted by gesture and mimicry, in the drama and at the
same time the sublimity of the treatment, Leonardo attained a height
of expression that has remained a model of its kind. Untold painters
in succeeding generations, among them great masters such as Rubens
and Rembrandt, marvelled at Leonardo's composition and were
influenced by it. The painting also inspired some of Goethe's finest
pages of descriptive prose. It has become widely known through
countless reproductions and prints, the most important being those
produced by Raffaello Morghen in 1800. Thus, the "Last Supper" has
become part of humanity's common heritage and remains today one of
the world's outstanding paintings.
Technical
deficiencies in the execution of the work have not lessened its
fame. Leonardo was uncertain about the technique he should use. He
bypassed fresco painting, which, because it is executed on fresh
plaster, demands quick and uninterrupted painting, in favour of
another technique he had developed: tempera on a base mixed by
himself on the stone wall. This procedure proved unsuccessful,
inasmuch as the base soon began to be loosened from the wall. Damage
appeared by the beginning of the 16th century, and deterioration
soon set in. By the middle of the century the work was called a
ruin. Later, inadequate attempts at restoration only aggravated the
situation, and not until the most modern restoration techniques were
applied after World War II was the process of decay halted.
The
"Mona Lisa" and other works
In the Florence years between 1500 and 1506, four great creations
appeared that confirmed and heightened Leonardo's fame: the "Virgin
and Child with St. Anne" (Louvre), "Mona Lisa," "Battle of Anghiari,"
and "Leda." Even before it was completed, the "Virgin and Child with
St. Anne" won the critical acclaim of the Florentines; the
monumental plasticity of the group and the calculated effects of
dynamism and tension in the composition made it a model that
inspired Classicists and Mannerists in equal measure. The "Mona
Lisa" became the ideal type of portrait, in which the features and
symbolic overtones of the person painted achieved a complete
synthesis. The young Raphael sketched the work in progress, and it
served as a model for his "Portrait of Maddalena Doni." Similarly,
the "Leda" became a model of the figura serpentinata ("sinuous
figure")--that is, a figure built up from several intertwining
views. It influenced such classical artists as Raphael, who drew it,
but it had an equally strong effect on Mannerists such as Jacopo
Pontormo.
In the "Battle
of Anghiari" (1503-06) Leonardo's art of expression reached its high
point. The preliminary drawings--many of which have been
preserved--reveal Leonardo's lofty conception of the "science of
painting"; the laws of equilibrium that he had probed in his studies
in mechanics were put to artistic use in this painting. The "centre
of gravity" lies in the group of flags fought for by all the
horsemen. For a moment the intense and expanding movement of the
swirl of riders seems frozen; this passing moment, the transition
from one active movement to the next, is uniquely interpreted.
On the other
hand, Leonardo's studies in anatomy and physiology influenced his
representation of human and animal bodies, particularly when they
were in a state of excitement. He studied and described extensively
the baring of teeth and puffing of lips as signs of animal and human
anger. On the painted canvas, rider and horse, their features
distorted, are remarkably similar in expression.
The highly
imaginative trappings take the event out of the sphere of the
historical into a timeless realm. Thus, the "Battle of Anghiari"
became the standard model for a cavalry battle. Its composition has
influenced many painters: from Rubens in the 17th century, who made
the most impressive copy of the scene from Leonardo's now-lost
cartoon, to Delacroix in the 19th century.
Later painting and drawing
After 1507--in
Milan, Rome, and France--Leonardo did very little painting. He did
resume work on the Leda theme during his years in Milan and sketched
a variation, the "Kneeling Leda." The drawings he
prepared--revealing examples of his late style--have a curious,
enigmatic sensuality. Perhaps in Rome he began the "St. John the
Baptist," which he completed in France. Bursting all the boundaries
of usual painting tradition, he presented Christ's forerunner as the
herald of a mystic oracle; his was an "art of expression" that
seemed to strive consciously to bring out the hidden ambiguity of
the theme.
The last
manifestation of Leonardo's art of expression was in his "Visions of
the End of the World," a series of pictorial sketches that took the
end of the world as its theme. Here Leonardo's power of
imagination--born of reason and fantasy--attained its highest level.
The immaterial forces in the cosmos, invisible in themselves, appear
in the material things they set in motion. What Leonardo had
observed in the swirling of water and eddying of air, in the shape
of a mountain boulder and in the growth of plants now assumed
gigantic shape in cloud formations and rainstorms. The framework of
the world splits asunder, but even its destruction occurs--as the
monstrously "beautiful" forms of the unleashed elements show--in
accordance with the self-same laws of order, harmony, and proportion
that presided at its creation and that govern the life and death of
every created thing in nature. Without any model, these "visions"
are the last and most original expressions of Leonardo's art--an art
in which his perception based on saper vedere seems to have come to
fruition.
Sculpture
That Leonardo
worked as a sculptor from his youth on is borne out by his own
statements and those of other sources. In the introduction to his
Treatise on Painting he gives painting precedence over sculpture in
the hierarchy of the arts; yet he emphasizes that he practices both
arts equally. A small group of generals' heads in marble and
plaster, works of Verrocchio's followers, are sometimes linked with
Leonardo because a lovely drawing on the same theme from his hand
suggests such a connection. But the inferior quality of this group
rules out an attribution to the master. Not a trace has remained of
the heads of women and children that, according to Vasari, Leonardo
modelled in clay in his youth.
The two great
sculptural projects to which Leonardo devoted himself wholeheartedly
stood under an unlucky star; neither the huge, bronze equestrian
statue for Francesco Sforza, on which he worked until 1494, nor the
monument for Marshal Trivulzio, on which he was busy in the years
1506-11, were brought to completion. Leonardo kept a detailed diary
about his work on the Sforza horse; it came to light with the
rediscovery of the Madrid MS. 8936. Text and drawings both show
Leonardo's wide experience in the technique of bronze casting but at
the same time reveal the almost utopian nature of the project. He
wanted to cast the horse in a single piece, but the gigantic
dimensions of the steed presented insurmountable technical problems.
Indeed, Leonardo remained uncertain of the problem's solution to the
very end.
The drawings
for these two monuments reveal the greatness of Leonardo's concept
of sculpture. Exact studies of the anatomy, movement, and
proportions of a live horse--Leonardo even seems to have thought of
writing a treatise on the horse--preceded the sketches for the
monuments. Leonardo pondered the merits of two types, the galloping
or trotting horse, and in both cases decided in
favour of the latter. These sketches, superior in the suppressed
tension of horse and rider to the achievements of Donatello's
Gattamelata and Verrocchio's Colleoni sculptures, are among the most
beautiful and significant examples of Leonardo's art.
Unquestionably--as ideas--they exerted a very strong influence on
the development of equestrian statues in the 16th century.
A small bronze
of a galloping horseman in Budapest is so close to Leonardo's style
that, if not from his own hand, it must have been done under his
immediate influence (perhaps by Giovanni Francesco Rustici). Rustici,
according to Vasari, was Leonardo's zealous student and enjoyed his
master's help in sculpting his large group in bronze of "St. John
the Baptist Teaching" over the north door of the Baptistery in
Florence. There are, indeed, discernible traces of Leonardo's
influence in John's stance, with the unusual gesture of his upward
pointing hand, and in the figure of the bald-headed Levite.
Moreover, an echo of Leonardo's inspiration is unmistakable in the
much-discussed and much-reviled wax bust of "Flora" in Berlin. It
may have been made in France, perhaps in the circle of Rustici, who
entered Francis I's service in 1528.
Architecture
Leonardo,
who in a letter to Ludovico Sforza applying for service described
himself as an experienced architect, military engineer, and
hydraulic engineer, was concerned with architectural matters all his
life. But his effectiveness was essentially limited to the role of
an adviser. Only once--in the competition for the cupola of the
Milan cathedral (1487-90)--did he actually consider personal
participation; but he gave up this idea when the model he had
submitted was returned to him. In other instances, his claim to
being a practicing architect involved sketches for representative
secular buildings: for the palace of a Milanese nobleman (around
1490), for the villa of the French governor in Milan (1507-08), and
for the Medici residence in Florence (1515). Finally, there was his
big project for the palace and garden of Romorantin in France
(1517-19). Especially in this last named, Leonardo's pencil sketches
clearly reveal his mastery of technical as well as artistic
architectural problems; the view in perspective (at Windsor Castle)
gives an idea of the magnificence of the site.
Leonardo was
also quite active as a military engineer, beginning with the years
of his stay in Milan. But no definite examples of his work can be
adduced. Not until the discovery of the Madrid notebooks was it
known that in 1504, sent probably by the Florence governing council,
he stood at the side of the Lord of Piombino when the city's
fortifications system was repaired and that Leonardo suggested a
detailed plan for overhauling it. Finally, his studies for
large-scale canal projects in the Arno region and in Lombardy show
that he was also an expert in hydraulic engineering.
But what
really characterizes Leonardo's architectural studies and makes them
stand out is their comprehensiveness; they range far afield and
embrace every type of building problem of his time. Furthermore,
there frequently appears evidence of Leonardo's impulse to teach: he
wanted to collect his writings on this theme in a theory of
architecture. This treatise on architecture--the initial lines of
which are in MS. B (Institut de France, Paris), a model book of the
types of sacred and profane buildings--was to deal with the entire
field of architecture as well as with the theory of forms and
construction and was to include such items as urbanism, sacred and
profane building, and a compendium of the important individual
elements (for example, domes, steps, portals, and windows).
In the
fullness and richness of their ideas, Leonardo's architectural
studies offer an unusually wide-ranging insight into the
architectural achievements of his epoch. Like a seismograph, his
observations sensitively register all themes and problems. For
almost 20 years he was associated with Bramante at the court of
Milan and again met him in Rome in 1513-14; he was closely
associated with such other distinguished architects as Francesco di
Giorgio, Giuliano da Sangallo, Giovanni Antonio Amadeo, and Luca
Fancelli. Thus, he was brought in closest touch with all of the most
significant building undertakings of the time. Since Leonardo's
architectural drawings extend over his whole life, they span
precisely that developmentally crucial period--from the 1480s to the
second decade of the 16th century--in which the principles of the
classical style were formulated and came to maturity. That this
genetic process can be followed in the ideas of one of the greatest
men of the period lends Leonardo's studies their distinctive
artistic value and their outstanding historical significance.
Science
Science of painting
Notwithstanding Leonardo's abundant scientific activity, one must
never lose sight of the fact that it was the intellectual output of
a man who proudly and consciously felt himself an artist throughout
his life. And he described himself as such. He first came in contact
with science as an artist, in the task he set himself of writing a
treatise on painting.
Leonardo's
famous book on painting, in the form known and read today, is not an
original work by the master but a compilation of texts from various
manuscripts by Leonardo, collected and arranged with loving care by
his disciple and heir, Francesco Melzi. It is the Codex Urbinas
Latinus 1270, now in the Vatican Library. It was prepared around
1540-50, but from its form one can see that it was still an
unfinished rather than a completed manuscript. Many original texts
known to exist are missing; whole sections of Leonardo's overall
plan are not included.
The first
printed edition of the treatise in Melzi's version, omitting the
long introductory chapter concerning the "pecking order" among the
arts, appeared in a luxurious binding in 1651 in Paris, published by
Raffaelo du Fresne with illustrations after drawings by Nicolas
Poussin. The first complete edition of Melzi's text did not appear
until 1817, published by Guglielmo Manzi in Rome. The two standard
modern editions are that of Emil Ludwig, three volumes, Vienna, 1882
(with German translation); and that of A. Philip McMahon, Princeton,
1956, two volumes (facsimile of the Codex Urbinas and English
translation).
Leonardo's
plan envisaged a much broader treatment of the theme, as his own
allusions to it indicate. For, in addition to detailed practical
instructions for painting and drawing, the treatise was to deal with
every area involving the artist's perception and experience, which
he could then convey as acquired criteria. Three main problems form
the keynote of the work: the definition of painting as a science,
which is briefly outlined above; the theory of the mathematical
basis of painting--that is, geometry, perspective, and optics--with
the systematic study of light and shadow, colour, and aerial
perspective; and the theory of forms and functions in organic and
inorganic nature, as they are explained and made comprehensible to
the painter trained in saper vedere. This theory of the forms and
functions of the visible world sought first of all to describe the
animal world, including man; next it sought
to include the plant world; finally it endeavoured to explain how
such phenomena of inorganic nature as water and earth, air and fire
came into being.
In the
drawings for the Treatise on Painting, extending from the earliest
Milan period to the final years of Leonardo's life in France, the
progressive broadening and deepening of the theme can be followed.
Many drawings were placed by the side of the text, and some
of them were coloured; many studies of nature that are admired as
art works, such as the famous rain landscape (Windsor Castle; 12409)
or the "Foliage" (Royal Library, Windsor Castle; 12431), can be
identified as illustrations for the treatise. Manuscript C in the
Institut de France, Paris, with its diagrams of the blending of
lights and shadows, likewise represents a segment of this textbook.
Leonardo's so-called grotesque heads are also closely linked with
the treatise. They have often been erroneously described as
caricatures; but actually, for the most part, they represent types
and only occasionally individuals. They are variations of the human
face in its gradations between the poles of the beautiful and ugly,
the normal and abnormal, the dignified and vulgar. They are also
related to anatomical-physiological studies, in which old age--with
wrinkled skin and bulging tendons--is contrasted with youth.
Representation of the human being was to be treated at length: his
body, his proportions, his organs and their functions but also his
attitudes in physical and spiritual movement. Here Leonardo's
artistic and scientific aims intertwine.
Anatomical studies and drawing
Leonardo's
anatomical studies are perhaps the best way of revealing the process
by which, in Leonardo's mind, an increasing differentiation set in
among his diverse spheres of interest; but it was a differentiation
in which the seemingly divergent areas of study--likewise on a
higher level--always remained interrelated. Thus, Leonardo's study
of anatomy, originally pursued for his training as an artist,
quickly grew into an independent area of research. As his sharp eye
uncovered the structure of the human body, Leonardo became
fascinated by the figura istrumentale dell' omo ("man's instrumental
figure"), and he sought to probe it and present it as a creation of
nature. The early studies dealt chiefly with the skeleton and
muscles; yet even at the outset Leonardo combined anatomical with
physiological researches. From observing the static structure,
Leonardo proceeded to study the functions exercised by the
individual parts of the body as they bring into play the organism's
mechanical activity. This led him finally to the study of the
internal organs; among them he probed most deeply into the brain,
heart, and lungs as the "motors" of the senses and of life. He did
practical work in anatomy on the dissection table in Milan, then in
the hospital of Sta. Maria Nuova in Florence, and again in Milan and
Pavia, where he received counsel and inspiration from the
physician-anatomist Marcantonio della Torre. By his own admission he
dissected 30 corpses in his lifetime, thus acquiring an astonishing
range of experience on his own. This experience was distilled in the
famous anatomical drawings, which are among the most significant
achievements of Renaissance science. These drawings, among his
dimostrazione, are based on a curious connection between natural and
abstract representation; sections in perspective, reproduction of
muscles as "strings" or the indication of hidden parts by dotted
lines, and finally a specifically devised hatching system enable him
to represent any part of the body in transparent layers that afford
an "insight" into the organ. Here Leonardo's mastery of drawing
proved most useful. The genuine value of these dimostrazione and
their superiority to descriptive words--as Leonardo proudly
emphasized--lay in the fact that they were able to synthesize a
multiplicity of individual experiences at the dissecting table and
make the data immediately and accurately visible. The effect is
unlike that of all dead anatomical preparations; in this way the
"live quality" of the organism is retained.
This great
picture chart of the human body was what Leonardo envisaged as a
cosmografia del minor mondo ("cosmography of the microcosm"). From
the advanced portions that have survived, it is apparent how much
and how long it occupied his mind. And it provided the basic
principles for modern scientific illustration. Leonardo has not
sufficiently received his due in this domain. Thanks to a method of
seeing that was peculiarly his own, he elevated the art of drawing
into a means of scientific investigation and teaching of the highest
quality.
Mechanics and cosmology
With Leonardo,
mechanics also proceeds from artistic practice, with which he became
quite familiar as an architect and engineer. Throughout his life
Leonardo was an inventive builder; he was thoroughly at home in the
principles of mechanics of his epoch and contributed in many ways to
advancing them.
His model book
on the elementary theory of mechanics, which appeared in Milan at
the end of the 1490s, was discovered in the Madrid Codex 8937. Its
importance lay less in its description of specific machines or work
tools than in its use of demonstration models to explain the basic
mechanical principles and functions employed in building machinery.
Leonardo was especially concerned with problems of friction and
resistance. These elements--screw threads, gears, hydraulic jacks,
swivelling devices, transmission gears, and the like--are described
individually or in various combinations; and here, too, drawing
takes precedence over the written word. As in his anatomical
drawings, Leonardo develops definite principles of graphic
representation--stylization, patterns, and diagrams--that guarantee
a precise demonstration of the object in question.
In the course
of years his interest in pure mechanics merged increasingly with an
interest in applied mechanics. Leonardo realized that the mechanical
forces at work in the basic laws of mechanics operate everywhere in
the organic and inorganic world. They determine animate and
inanimate nature alike as well as man. Leonardo wrote on a page of
his treatise on anatomy:
See to it
that the book of the principles of mechanics precedes the book
of force and movement of man and the other living creatures, for
only in that way will you be able to prove your statements.
So, finally,
"force" became the key concept for Leonardo; as virtщ spirituale
("spiritual property"), it shaped and ruled the cosmos.
Wherever
Leonardo probed the phenomena of nature, he recognized the existence
of primal mechanical forces that govern the shape and function of
the universe: in his studies on the flight of birds, in which his
youthful idea of the feasibility of a flying apparatus took shape
and led to exhaustive research into the element of air; in his
studies of water, the vetturale della natura ("conveyor of nature"),
in which he was as much concerned with the physical properties of
water as with its laws of motion and currents; in his researches on
the laws of growth of plants and trees as well as the geological
structure of earth and hill formations; and finally in his
observation of air currents, which evoked the image of the flame of
a candle or the picture of a wisp of cloud and smoke. In his
drawings, especially in his studies of whirlpools, based on numerous
experiments he undertook, Leonardo again found a stylized form of
representation that was uniquely his own: this involved breaking
down a phenomenon into its component parts--the traces of water or
eddies of the whirlpool--yet at the same time preserving the total
picture, analytic and synthetic vision.
Thus, for all
the separate individual realms of his knowledge, Leonardo's science
offered a unified picture of the world: a cosmogony based on saper
vedere. Its final wisdom is that all the workings of nature are
subject to a law of necessity and a law of order that the Primo
Motore, the divine "Prime Mover," created. "Marvelous is Thy
justice, O Prime Mover! Thou hast seen to it that no power lacks the
order and value of your necessary governance."
Leonardo as artist-scientist
As
the 15th century expired, Scholastic doctrines were in decline, and
humanistic scholarship was on the rise. Leonardo, however, was part
of an intellectual circle that developed a third, specifically
modern form of cognition. In his view the artist--as transmitter of
the true and accurate data of experience acquired by visual
observation--played a significant part. With this sense of the
artist's high calling, Leonardo approached the vast realm of nature
to probe its secrets. His utopian idea of transmitting in
encyclopaedic form the knowledge thus won was still bound up with
medieval Scholastic conceptions, but the results of his research
were among the first great achievements of the thinking of the new
age because they were based on the principle of experience in an
absolutely new way and to an unprecedented degree.
Finally,
Leonardo, although he made strenuous efforts to teach himself and
become erudite in languages, natural science, mathematics,
philosophy, and history, as a mere listing of the wide-ranging
contents of his library demonstrates, remained an empiricist of
visual observation. But precisely here--thanks to his genius--he
developed his own "theory of knowledge," unique in its kind, in
which art and science form a synthesis. In the face of the overall
achievements of Leonardo's creative genius, the question of how much
he finished or did not finish becomes pointless. The crux of the
matter is his intellectual force--self-contained and inherent in
every one of his creations. This force has remained constantly
operative to the present day.
Paintings
"The
Annunciation" (c. 1472-77; Uffizi, Florence); "The Annunciation" (c.
1472-77; Louvre, Paris); "Madonna with the Carnation" (c. 1474; Alte
Pinakothek, Munich); "Portrait of Ginevra de' Benci" (c. 1475-78;
National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.); "Madonna Benois"
(1478-after 1500; Hermitage, St. Petersburg); "St. Jerome" (c. 1480;
Vatican Museums, Rome); "The Adoration of the Magi" (1481; Uffizi);
"The Virgin of the Rocks" (c. 1483-85; Louvre); "The Musician" (c.
1490; Pinacoteca Ambrosiana, Milan); "Lady with an Ermine" ("Cecilia
Gallerani"; c. 1490; Muzeum Narodowe, Krakуw, Poland); "The Virgin
of the Rocks" (1494-1508; National Gallery, London); "Last Supper"
(1495-97; Sta. Maria delle Grazie, Milan); decoration of the Sala
delle Asse (1498; Castello Sforzesco, Milan); "The Virgin and Child
with St. Anne" (cartoon, c. 1499; National Gallery); "Virgin and
Child with St. Anne" (c. 1501-12; Louvre); "Mona Lisa" ("La Gioconda";
1503-06; Louvre); "St. John the Baptist" (before 1517; Louvre).
Lost: "Madonna with the Yarn-Winder" (1501; best copy in the Duke of
Buccleuch Collection, Boughton, Kettering); "Leda" (1503-06; best
copy at Galleria Borghese, Rome); "Battle of Anghiari" (1503-06;
copy at Palazzo Vecchio, Florence).
|