|
|
Artistic Origins and Early Biblical Scenes
|
|
|
|

Ecce Homo
1490s
Oil on panel, 52 x 54 cm
Museum of Art, Philadelphia
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we know little about Bosch's life, we know even less
about his artistic background. It is generally assumed that
he was trained by his father or one of his uncles, but all
their paintings have been lost, including those commissioned
by the Brotherhood of Our Lady. Some light can be cast on
the stylistic origins of Bosch's earliest works, however, by
considering them within the context of fifteenth-century
Netherlandish painting in general. By the time his name
began to appear in the records of 's-Hertogenbosch, the
first great masters of the Flemish school, Jan van Eyckand
Robert Campin, had been dead some thirty years. Roger van
der Weyden had also died, but his cool and restrained art
was continued, somewhat ineptly, by his followers in
Brussels; it had also profoundly influenced Dirk Bouts, now
at the end of his career in Louvain, and Hans Memling in
Bruges. A more independent style was emerging in the
powerful compositions of Hugo van der Goes in Ghent.
During Bosch's lifetime, the northern provinces of the
Netherlands were neither as wealthy nor as politically
powerful as Brabant and Flanders, and they had neither the
extensive patronage nor the large workshops of the cities to
the south. Many early Dutch paintings, moreover, were
destroyed in the iconoclastic riots of the Reformation and
so relatively few have survived. Nevertheless, it is evident
that a fairly significant school of painting existed at
Haarlem under Geertgen tot Sint Jans and his followers,
while the anonymous Master of the Virgo inter Virgines
worked in Delft during the last two decades of the century.
Although only a few panel paintings can be connected with
Utrecht, this ancient city, seat of a bishopric, seems to
have been an important centre of manuscript illumination
whose originality and significance have yet to be fully
recognized. The stylistic unity of Flemish painting,
dominated as it was by the genius of Roger van der Weyden,
is absent in the northern Netherlands, where local and
individual styles were more predominant. The Dutch artists,
nevertheless, have many qualities in common, including
deeply felt, expressive interpretations of biblical
narrative and, especially in the case of Geertgen tot Sint
Jans and the illuminators, a vision of man and the world
based more on direct experience than on artistic convention.
Because 's-Hertogenbosch was a part of Brabant and the
church of St John represents the high point of Brabantine
Gothic, many writers have sought the origins of Bosch's art
in the traditions established by Robert Campin, Roger van
der Weyden and other artists who worked in the southern
Netherlands. Bosch's later works, it is true, show many
connections with Brabant and the south, but his earliest
paintings display more affinities with Dutch art,
particularly with the manuscript illuminations.
Among the works generally ascribed to Bosch's first period
of activity (c. 1470-85) may be included several small
biblical scenes: the »Epiphany (Adoration of the Magi)« in
Philadelphia, the »Ecce Homo« in Frankfurt (with a related
version in Boston, Museum of Fine Arts) and an altar wing in
Vienna, the »Christ Carrying the Cross«. Their early date is
suggested by their relatively simple compositions and their
adherence to traditional compositional types.
This early style is especially well exemplified in the
charming »Epiphany« in Philadelphia.
|
|
|
|

Epiphany
1475-80
Oil on panel, 74 x 54 cm
Museum of Art, Philadelphia
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dignified comportment of the Kings is set off by the
impulsive gesture of the Christ Child, while the aged Joseph
stands discreetly to one side, removing his hood as if
abashed by the presence of the splendidly dressed strangers.
From behind the shed two shepherds look on with shy
curiosity. At this early date, Bosch's grasp of perspective
was apparently none too firm; particularly ambiguous is the
spatial relationship of the stable to the figures in the
foreground, although the crumbling walls and thatched roof
have been painted with a loving attention to detail. In the
distance at the upper right can be seen a pasture filled
with grazing cattle and the shimmering towers of a city.
The intimate, almost cosy atmosphere of the Philadelphia
»Epiphany« is replaced in the Frankfurt »Ecce Homo« by the
brutality of his Passion.
|

Ecce Homo
1475-80
Tempera and oil on oak panel, 71 x 61 cm
Stadelsches Kunstinstitut, Frankfurt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crowned with thorns and his flesh beaten raw by the
scourge, he now stands with Pilate and his companions before
the angry mob. The dialogue between Pilate and the crowd is
indicated by the Gothic inscriptions which function not
unlinke the balloons in a modern comic strip. From the mouth
of Pilate issue the words »Ecce Homo« (Behold the Man).
There is no need to decipher the inscription »Crufige Eum«
(Crucify Him), the cry which rises from the people below;
their animosity is unmistakably conveyed by their facial
expressions and threatening gestures. The third inscription
»Salve nos Christe redemptor« (Save us, Christ Redeemer)
once emerged from two donors at lower left, but their
figures have been painted over. As with the Magi in the
Philadelphia »Epiphany«, the heathen character of the men
surrounding Christ is suggested by their strange dress and
headgear, including pseudo-oriental turbans. The scene's
essential wickedness is further indicated by such
traditional emblems of evil as the owl in the niche above
Pilate and the giant toad sprawled on the back of a shield
carried by one of the soldiers. In the background appears a
city square, the Turkish crescent fluttering from one of its
towers. The enemies of Christ have been identified with the
power of Islam which in Bosch's day, and long afterwards,
controlled the most holy places of Christendom. The
buildings, however, are late Gothic; only the oddly bulging
tower in the distance evokes a feeling of far-off places.
The Dutch character of these two early works is
unmistakable. The Philadelphia »Epiphany« represents a
reworking of a composition which had long been used by the
Dutch manuscript illuminators. Likewise, the homely faces
and animated gestures of Christ's tormentors in the »Ecce
Homo« recall Passion scenes in Dutch manuscripts of the
second and third quarters of the fifteenth century, where we
encounter similar physical types, slight in proportion,
flatly modelled and often unsubstantial beneath their heavy
robes.
The same style appears in the Vienna »Christ Carrying the
Cross«, where the head of Christ is silhouetted against a
dense mass of grimacing soldiers and ill-wishers, one of
them bearing the familiar toad on his shield. Christ's
physical agony is heightened by the spike-studded wooden
blocks which dangle fore and aft from his waist, lacerating
his feet and ankles with every step. This cruel device was
frequently represented by Dutch artists well into the
sixteenth century. The high horizon is old-fashioned, as is
the lack of spatial recession in the middle distance. In the
foreground, soldiers torment the bad thief while the good
thief kneels before a priest. The almost frantic intensity
of his confession, well-expressed by the open-mouthed
profile, contrasts vividly with the passive response of the
priest who seems to suppress a yawn. The very presence of
the priest is, of course, an anachronism, probably inspired
by what Bosch had witnessed at contemporary executions; the
same motif appears in the great multi-figure »Christ
Carrying the Cross« which Pieter Bruegel the Elder was to
paint almost a century later.
|
|
|

Christ Carrying the Cross
1480s
Oil on panel, 57 c 32 cm
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna
|
|
|
|
|
|
This urge to embellish the biblical text with details
drawn from everyday life is characteristic for the later
Middle Ages, it appears in the mystery plays and in such
devotional books as the »Meditations on the Life of Christ«
attributed to St Bonaventure. The Dutch illuminators, above
all, frequently interpreted the sacred stories in common
everyday terms in order to make them more immediate to the
spectator.
This very human quality is no less apparent in another work
which, although not a biblical subject, belongs to Bosch's
early paintings. This is the »Conjuror«, now lost but known
through a faithful copy at Saint-Ger-main-en-Laye (right). A
mountebank has set up his table before a crumbling stone
wall. His audience watches spellbound as he seems to bring
forth a frog from the mouth of an old man in their midst;
only one of the crowd, the young man with his hand on the
shoulder of his female companion, appears to notice that the
old man's purse is being stolen by the conjuror's
confederate. The myopic gaze of the thief and the stupid
amazement of the frog-spitting victim are superbly played
off against the amused reactions of the bystanders, while
the slyness of the mountebank is well conveyed in his
sharp-nosed physiognomy. As in the »Christ Carrying the
Cross«, Bosch exploits the human face in profile for
expressive purposes. Although the »Conjuror« may possess a
moralizing significance, as we shall see, it must have been
inspired by a real-life situation closely observed. The
perceptive, spontaneous humour of this little picture would
be difficult to match in contemporary Flemish painting, but
parallels can again be found among Dutch manuscript
illuminators, such as the Master of Evert van Soudenbalch,
active in Utrecht during the 1450s and 1460s.
Other biblical scenes may be ascribed to Bosch's early
years: the »Marriage Feast at Cana« (Rotterdam) and the
badly damaged Crucifixion of St Julia« (Venice, Palace of
the Doges), of which only the central panel is from Bosch's
hand (p. 84). In addition, there are several
compositions which have survived only in copies of
indifferent quality, including the »Christ among the
Doctors» and »Christ with the Woman Taken in Adultery« both
of which recall the »Conjuror« in style. Among the early
drawings are a sheet of animated male figures looking
towards the right (New York, Morgan Library), perhaps a
study for an »Ecce Homo« scene, and a monumental,
relief-like »Entombment« (London, British Museum).
|
|
|

Group of Male Figures
Pen, 124 x 126 mm
Pierpont Morgan Library, New York
|
|
|
|
|
|

The Entombment
1507
Ink and grey wash, 250 x 350 mm
British Museum, London
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only a few of the early paintings depart significantly
from traditional iconography, but these exceptions
anticipate the innovations of his later work. The treatment
of the two thieves in the »Christ Carrying the Cross« is
apparently without precedent, but still more unusual is the
reverse of this panel, depicting a naked child pushing a
walking-frame. This is the Christ Child, whose first halting
steps clearly parallel Christ struggling with his Cross on
the obverse, while the toy windmill or whirligig clutched in
his hand probably alludes to the Cross itself. Thus Bosch
gives us a touching picture of Christ in all his human
frailty as he begins the road to his Passion.
|
|
|

Christ Child with a Walking Frame
1480s
Oil on panel, diameter 28 cm
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna
|
|
|
|
|
Even less traditional is the »Marriage Feast at Cana«, painted towards the end of Bosch's early period.
The picture is not in good condition; the upper corners have
been cut off, many heads have been repainted, and a pair of
dogs at the lower left may have been added as late as the
eighteenth century.
In the large Dutch bible previously mentioned, an assistant
of the Soudenbalch Master had presented the first miracle of
Christ, the transformation of water into wine, as a rustic
wedding feast; with characteristic humour, he showed one
guest thirstily emptying a pot of wine, as if to explain
just why Christ's miracle was so urgently required. Bosch's
interpretation, on the other hand, is more serious in mood
and much more complex in meaning. The marriage banquet has
been placed in a richly furnished interior, most probably a
tavern, the setting for the Cana story in at least one Dutch
Easter play of the period. The miracle of the wine jars
takes place at lower right; the guests are seated around an
L-shaped table dominated at one end by the figure of Christ,
behind whom hangs the brocaded cloth of honour usually
reserved for the bride; he is flanked by two male donors in
contemporary dress. Next to the Virgin at the centre of the
table appear the solemn, austerely clad bridal couple; the
bridegroom must be John the Evangelist, for his face closely
resembles the type which Bosch employed elsewhere for this
saint. Although the bridegroom remains nameless in the New
Testament account, he was frequently identified as Christ's
most beloved disciple. It was believed that at the
conclusion of the feast, Christ called to him, saying:
»Leave this wife of yours and follow me. I shall lead you to
a higher wedding.« According to some writers, moreover, the
abandoned bride was none other than Mary Magdalene. Thus the
feast at Cana embodied the medieval ideal of chastity as
more perfect in the sight of God than carnal union.
This medieval dualism between the flesh and the spirit
receives further elaboration in the Rotterdam panel. Christ
and his friends are pensively absorbed in some inner vision,
unaware of the evil enchantment which seems to have fallen
upon the banquet hall. The other wedding guests drink or
gossip, watched by the bagpiper who leers drunkenly from a
platform at the upper left. On the columns flanking the rear
portal, two sculptured demons have mysteriously come to
life; one aims an arrow at the other who escapes by
disappearing through a hole in the wall. From the left, two
servants carry in a boar's head and a swan spitting fire
from their mouths; an ancient emblem of Venus, the swan
symbolized unchastity. This unholy revelry seems to be
directed by the innkeeper or steward who stands with his
baton in the rear chamber. On the sideboard next to him are
displayed curiously formed vessels, some of which, like the
pelican, are symbolic of Christ, while others possess less
respectable connotations, such as the three naked dancers on
the second shelf.
The precise meaning of all these details remains unclear, as
does that of the richly gowned child, his back turned to the
viewer, who seems to toast the bridal couple with a chalice.
However this may be, Bosch has undoubtedly employed the
tavern setting as an image of evil, a comparison popular in
medieval sermons, thereby contrasting the chaste marriage
feast at Cana with the debauchery of the world.
In its transformation of a biblical story, the »Marriage
Feast of Cana« introduces us for the first time to the
complexity of Bosch's thought. It presents, on the one hand,
a moral allegory of man's pursuit of the flesh at the
expense of his spiritual welfare, and on the other, the
monastic ideal of a life secure from the world in
contemplation of God. These two themes were to dominate
almost all Bosch's later art.
|

Marriage Feast at Cana
Oil on panel, 93 x 72 cm
Museum Boumans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam
|
|
Painted by Bosch towards the end of his early period,
this is not a traditional treatment of the subject. The
marriage at Cana is the story of Christ's first miracle -
turning water into wine. The bride and bridegroom are
central while the figure of Christ is placed on the right in
front of the brocaded cloth of honour, customarily the
bride's place. Christ's hand is raised in blessing. Although
not mentioned in the Bible, the groom has been identified by
Bosch as St John. It has also been contended that the bride
is Mary Magdalene. There was a tradition that at the end of
the feast Christ called to the groom to leave his bride and
follow him. The fact that St John is known as Christ's best
loved disciple lays a special emphasis on the
interpretation. The symbolism is of a spiritual chastity
more elevated and pure than the carnal union of marriage.
The incidentals also attract great interest: the water jug
filling wine jars; the drunken bagpiper suggesting a tavern,
a licentious setting; a swan (an emblem of Venus) spitting
fire, suggesting the opposite of chastity. Each part of the
painting carries such messages, often hidden to us but
recognizable to Bosch's contemporaries.
|
|