see also:
Art Deco
|
7 American Art Deco
and the Second World War
|
|
|
During the 1920s, the professions of graphic designer
and art director
gradually increased their visibility in the United
States. Someone with the title
"art director," often a graphic designer, had general
responsibility for the
design and
typography of a given publication, although they
might not always
do the actual work themselves. In the 1920s, a
number of organizations were
founded in the United States that provided lectures,
exhibitions, and conferences that helped support and define the field. In
1920, the Art Directors' Club
of New York was established, and 1927 saw the
creation of the Society of
Typographic Artists in Chicago. While the American
Institute of Graphic Arts
had been founded in 1914 with a focus on fine art
printing it gradually
shifted its activities into the commercial design
fields. Through a diffuse
process, there was also increasing recognition that
individuals proficient in the
manipulation of text and image were central to all
types of printed media.
Advertising agencies and publishers, especially in
the mass media, became
more cognizant in the 1920s of the unique set of
skills possessed by art directors.
There was a concomitant expansion of the advertising industry in the
United States during this period that created new
opportunities for graphic designers. Between 1914 and 1929, the
annual dollar volume of advertising
rose from $600,000 to nearly 3 billion dollars. New
advertising agencies
appeared almost monthly, while older operations
doubled and trebled their
staffs. Newspapers alone carried 2.25 million
dollars' worth of advertisements
in the year 1927. The advertising "game" acquired a
new sense ofprofessional-ism
as it became gradually more economically important to the country.
|
|
The American Magazine
|
|
While the 1920s in Europe were marked by the
development of modern, abstract styles, in the United States the
decade saw the continued dominance of conventional design and
typography. While there were isolated instances of experimental
modern
graphics reaching mainstream publications, conservative
American advertisers favored traditional illustration and rather
unadventurous photography over more progressive
styles.
However, as early as 1925, the year of the
influential
"Exposition Internationale des Arts Decorattfs et
Industriels Modernes"
in Paris, a gradual trickle of European and
European-inspired designs made its first appearance on the American
scene. The United States had earlier rejected sponsoring a pavilion
at the
exposition because of a disdain for the modern styles to be exhibited
there. However, in 1925, exhibits from that summer's
exposition were
featured at New York City's Metropolitan Museum of Art's annual
"Industrial art" exhibit, signaling very strongly for the first time
a mainstream interest in the Art Deco style. Department stores in a
number of major American cities across the country soon followed the
museum's lead, and 1926 witnessed a further expansion of interest in
Art Deco, at least among sophisticated urban consumers.
It is important to be able to identify the two
separate streams
that made up
modern European design during this era; the first,
discussed in Chapter 4,
consisted of designers such as Edward
McKnight Kauffer and Cassandre
who used formal devices derived from modern art movements,
including Cubism, Futurism,
Orphism, and Purism, in order to create striking graphics. This
first stream culminated in the An Deco style, and is
sometimes referred to by scholars as "commercial modern." The
second stream of European design, discussed mainly in Chapters
5 and 6, consisted of Dada as well as the various "functionalist"
oriented groups, including De Stijl, Russian Constructivism,
International Constructivism, Bauhaus, and the New Typography.
This second stream can be differentiated from the first by the
member artists' deep commitment to political change. More
importantly, the second, Constructivist stream emphasized graphic
design and typography over fine art, so that its work directly
speaks to the graphic design profession. Of course, there is
substantial overlap between the Art Deco and Constructivist
projects, and a movement such as Futurism, for example, inspired
artists in both camps. However, it is useful to be able to recognize
the different historical roots in the work of a designer who
employs functionalist typography versus a designer who draws
in a Cubist-inspired decorative idiom.
During the 1930s, the vast majority of modern design
works in America and Europe
proudly displayed the Art Deco,
or commercial modern, style.
Promoters of the austere Constructivism of the Bauhaus and the like
were rare, small
voices crying in the wilderness.
In order to give some sense of the development of
American
graphic design during the 1930s, it is helpful to undertake a selective
survey of the contents of two mainstream magazines from
February 1930, Fortune and Vanity hair. While the
overwhelming
majority of advertisements published in these magazines, as well as
the design of the publications themselves, feature conventional
graphics and typography, much of the most exciting work during
the 1930s was published in publications such as these. Periodicals
would
evolve more quickly than other media and present one of
the best sources of commissions for expatriate European designers
as well
as Americans with a contemporary sensibility.
|
|
Fortune
|
|
The first issue of Fortune magazine appeared
in February 1930.
A product of the large media corporation Time, the new periodical
was aimed at the affluent urban businessman. Published and edited by
Henry Luce (1898-1967), Fortune contained critical
analyses and feature articles on major American industries. For
example, the inaugural issue presented commentary on the financial
markets as well as articles on a variety of business-related subjects,
from the use of color in consumer goods to a profile of the
Rothschild banking family in England. It also promised that
March's issue would cover subjects including aluminum, railroads,
and
jewels.
Fortunes
first art director was T.M. Cleland (1880-1964), who
chose a characteristically conservative design, the most prominent
element of which was the bold, three-dimensional ser-iffed
lettering used as the masthead. For the most part, the text
and images were set apart as discrete units, with headings placed
symmetrically at the top of the page (Jig. 7.2). The only
daring
dement in the magazine's early stages was the employment of
photographer Margaret Bourke-White (1904-1971). Bourke-White
had initially established herself as a photographer of industrial
landscapes in Cleveland, Ohio, where she ran a small
independent photography studio. Discovered by Henry Luce in
1929, she set to work that autumn on a series of
photographs of Swift and
Co.'s Chicago hog processing plant, which illustrated
the first issue of Fortune. While her editor at Fortune,
Parker
Lloyd-Smith, had to quit the scene when he was overcome by
the stench of the slaughter, Bourke-White persevered through the
assignment, reportedly abandoning all her photographic equipment
to be burned when she was finished. Her photo series
included the strikingly
modernist image shown here of a mountain containing 1,500 tons of
"pig-dust," ground remains that
would be turned into animal feed
(fig. 7.3). The abstract geometry
of the piles provides a perfect
counterpoint to the organic shape of the lone worker shoveling
remains. The cropping of this
macabre image makes it more
unsettling, as the piles of remains
and the figure are not securely
anchored to the ground line. While Bourke-White's photos were often
composed with sophisticated
Constructivist elements, their
layout in Fortune was quite conventional. The frame around
the image separates it from the page, for example, while the
centered caption detracts from the asymmetry
of the photo.
The first fifty-two pages of Fortune's
inaugural issue were
made up of advertisements that ranged widely in design. However, the
majority of the ads featured quite conventional typography matched
with realistic illustration or photography.
A fine example of a typical American advertisement from this period
appeared on page 33 (fig. 7.4). It is useful to analyze this
advertisement so as to establish a baseline of typical advertising
fare from the beginning of the decade. Promoting the "Wurlitzer
Reproducing Organ," a self-playing device, the most striking part of
the ad's typography is the letter "E" in the word "Entertaining."
Serving as a kind of dropped capital, this letter is
monstrously proportioned and clashes with the rest of the tag line,
which is printed in a seriffed italic. This boxy, plaid "E" is just
one part of an overall chaotic exercise in typography, as
throughout the ad a
number of inelegant faces compete for the reader's attention. This
typography lacks both the stylized grace and elegance of Art Deco
and the functional clarity of Constructivism.
There are two illustrations in the advertisement, the most prominent
of which is centered at the top. Here, a pedestrian
representational style has been
used to showcase a wealthy family listening to the organ in
their elegant salon. The image and text
are aligned symmetrically, but
there is little else connecting them.
It is obvious from advertisements
such as this that the copywriter was the most prominent part of any
advertising team as the 1930s
began. The Wurlitzer organ is
described in three columns of text
that exalt "the pleasure it gives
your guests and your family, the
cultural development it affords
your children, the distinction it
adds to your home." Indeed, this
ad is actually relatively concise
by the standards of the day, at
a time when companies expected their publicity materials to set out
fully in writing the basis for the product.
In the staid pages of Fortune, the vast
majority of the illustrations,
such as those in the Wurlitzer ad, were devoid of modern
tendencies. American corporations had a fundamentally conservative
outlook, and more than anything else they sought out art
directors who would avoid
offending middle-class taste. The few
instances of more progressive
design techniques tended to occur when the advertised company itself
was European or featured a product directly related to Europe. For
example, the combined
White Star, Red Star, and Atlantic Transport Lines, owned by the
International Mercantile Marine Company (IMM), paid for an ad trumpeting
their passenger and freight services. IMM was in fact
an American company, part of J.P.
Morgan's financial empire, but it had maintained a European
flavor in acquiring a number of
British shipping interests in 1910. The illustration for this ad
makes for a dramatic contrast with the representational style of
the Wurlitzer designer;
the bow and side of a ship shown here are pure Art Deco: simplified
forms, a powerful diagonal axis, cropping, and extreme
foreshortening (fig. 7.5). As in the ad for the organ, there
is a great deal of text, and the image is seemingly a secondary
concern. Both ads feature a prosaic design that places headline text
in large scale sandwiched between an image above and body text
below. The typography is a mix of sans serif headings
and seriffed text, arranged in an asymmetrical block that is
rather daring for the pages of
Fortune. Presumably, someone
preparing a
business trip to Europe would be familiar with modernism and more
open to this sort of stylish rendering.
In the advertisements published in Fortune, illustration and
photography seem almost interchangeable. Like the image used for the
Wurlitzer ad, the majority of the photos are completely nondescript
in both style and subject matter. One advertisement from the
air-conditioner company Carrier in the February issue,
however, stood out for its striking modernist photographic composition
(fig. 7.6). The ad, featuring the tag line "Are these tallest
office buildings already obsolete?" is, like so many others, heavily
dependent on expository text. Promoting the new technology of
"manufactured weather," or air conditioning, the copywriter has
explained in great detail the advantages of this "healthful comfort."
The roman type makes a number of seemingly eclectic
shifts between italic and bold, although some attempt is made
to indicate emphasis, as in the words "already
obsolete." While
many elements of the typography appear to us reserved and
conventional, this photograph of New York skyscrapers is so
startlingly modern in appearance that it could almost have been
shot by Laszlo Moholy-Nagy. The three buildings are shown from
a radically oblique angle, hovering over the viewer. An essentially
abstract composition, three gray geometric masses appear to float
in the air, as the photo is cropped so that none of
the buildings appears anchored to the ground. The ambient light has
created a
range of tones that emphasize the blocky shapes of the structures.
Carrier's advertisement for the March issue of
Fortune displayed
a similar concept, combining conventional design with stunningly
modern photography, in this case a photomontage that could have been
taken from the work of Berlin Dada (fig. 7.7).
Presenting a dynamic overview of a modern city, the image
combines skyscrapers, monumental neon signs, and even the US
Capitol. Despite the photo's striking style, it is still part of a
conventional layout that separates the image from the text with
framing devices. It is essential to remember that the use of
photography in the Carrier ads was extremely anomalous in 1930, as
the overwhelming majority of advertisements avoided
progressive design techniques at all costs.
In 1937, Fortune featured one of the most
famous An Deco designs of all time when the cover revealed a work by
the
Austrian expatriate artist Joseph Binder (1898-1972). Binder, who
had studied in Vienna under Alfred Roller (see Chapter 2),
moved to the United States in
1934. His cover for Fortune, published in December 1937,
uses the basic shape of a Christmas tree to structure a tower of
skyscrapers, a major symbol of American corporate power (fig.
7.1). The buildings display the stepped-pyramid
form that is typical of Art Deco architecture forced to conform to
zoning laws regulating the amount of shadow
produced by a building on city
streets. Binder successfully
contested the strong symmetry of
the triangular frame with a high
contrast deployment of black and
white blocks that form the sides of the skyscrapers. A comparison of
this image with Lyonel
Feininger's Cathedral (see fig. 6.7) shows how Art Deco
artists successfully assimilated Expressionist devices such as the
crystalline forms and starry sky shown here in order to convey
the magnificence of an urban,
capitalist Utopia. Overall, Fortune remained quite
reserved in its design until 1945, when the
German designer Will Burtin
(1909-1972), who had fled Nazi
Germany because his wife was
Jewish, took over as art director
and introduced a
new modern style.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.1 Joseph Binder, Skyscraper Christmas Tree,
Fortune Magazine,
Dec 1937. Magazine cover.
|

|
7.2 T. M.
Cleland, Contents Page,
Fortune magazine,
Feb 1930. p. 53.
|
7.3 Margaret Bourke-White. "In mammoth
dust-heaps ends the pig, completely disassembled, his remains
ground to pungent dust, he
fulfils his final function as good food for animals. In
this storeroom are 1500
tons of rich pig-dust, macabre mountains of meal."
Photograph, Fortune magazine, Feb 1930, p. 61.
|
7.4 Wurlitzer Advertisement,
Fortune magazine,
Feb 1930, p. 33.
|
|

|
7.5 IMM Advertisement, Fortune magazine,
Feb 1930, p. 17.
|
7.6 Carrier Advertisement,
Fortune magazine,
Feb 1930, p. 5.
|
7.7
Carrier Advertisement,
Fortune magazine,
March 1930, p. 5.
|
|
|
Mehemed Agha and Vanity Fair
|
|
One would expect that the editors of Vanity Fair
magazine, the
fashionable periodical devoted to the arts and culture edited by
Frank Crowninshield (1872-1947) and published by
Conde Nast (1873-1942), would be
more open to progressive design than the
editors of Fortune. Vanity
Fair was the premier periodical of this era to focus on
modern art, often publishing reproductions of
Cubist, Futurist, and
Expressionist works. Nast's stable of publications
included a number of European editions of his magazines,
Vogue
being the most
prominent example.
In
1929, Nast had hired the art director of the German edition
of Vogue magazine, Mehemed Agha (1896-1978), to take
over the design of his flagship
publications, first the American
Vogue,
and immediately thereafter Vanity Fair and House and Garden.
At Vanity Fair, Agha worked quickly to install a new
style that used elements drawn from both the Art Deco and
Constructivist streams of
European modernism. Art Deco had in
fact already been highly visible in the pages of Vanity Fair,
especially its cover an.
The February 1930 issue is typical of this
trend; the cover was drawn by
Georges Lepape (1887-1971), a
famed An Deco illustrator
(fig. 7.8). Lepape was French, and this cover shows his usual
whimsical assonment of characters drawn
from folklore and the Commedia
dell'Arte, which was a type
of popular, improvisational
theater that utilized stock characters.
The stylized simplification of
forms and strong geometric elements reminiscent of Cubism
demonstrate how Lepape, like Cassandre and others,
transformed modernist painting into a
sleek, glamorous form of commercial illustration.
The more dramatic initial change that Agha instituted at
Vanity Fair
concerned the magazine's typography. A devotee of
sans serif letters, Agha
redesigned the contents page using Paul
Renner's Futura type as well as
the bold rules and positive use
of negative space typical of Constructivist aesthetics (fig. 7.9).
However, Agha's design does not display the austere functionalism
typical of European Constructivist designs. Rather, the attenuated
proponions and wide spacing between the letters that spell
out " Vanity Fair"
and "in this number" are replete with the decorative elegance of the Art Deco style. In this way Agha has successfully
synthesized a new layout and typography from the
two main trends of European design, combining the clarity of
Constructivism with the sinuous grace of An Deco. International
Constructivism and the New Typography had made very few
inroads into American design culture at this point.
As early as 1930, Agha, who had already been the
first art director to use double-paged photo spreads and color cover
photography, became the first designer to make use of the "full
bleed," allowing photographs to expand to all four margins and
completely cover the page. This allowed for dramatic contrasts
of form and texture that created more sophisticated relationships
between text and image. In an example from Vanity Fair for
May
1934, an exceptional photograph by Bourke-White of a radio
transmission tower taken from an extremely oblique perspective
has completely suffused the right page (fig. 7.10). In
contrast to the
use of Bourke-White's photographs in Fortune, here there is
no
rule or frame to separate the image from the page itself. This "full
bleed" allows the asymmetrical, geometric complexity of the
tower's composition to play off the solid blocks of text to the
left.
The title "Trapping the magical waves of sound" serves to connect
text and image in the way it replicates a horizontal element in the
photograph. Note also how the heading is located asymmetrically
two-thirds of the way down the page, again in contrast to the
conventional, symmetrical layout in
Fortune.
In 1931, Conde Nast acknowleged Agha's importance to
his magazine empire when he included the art director's name on the
masthead of the contents page of Vanity Fair, alongside those
of the editor, Frank Crowninshield, and Nast himself. Agha's
significance to American magazine design was further recognized in
the mainstream press as early as 1939, when a brief article in
Time made note of his accomplishments. Significantly, this
unattributed
piece appeared in the "Art" section of Time, which
was an accomplishment
in itself. While heralding the art director as a pioneer in the use
of typography and photography, the article still manages
to be snide when it comes to modern design, suggesting that Agha's
use of blank spaces leaves "room for your laundry list"
while noting that the photography he uses features "cock-eyed"
perspectives. Agha is quoted to the effect that his success has
already started to dilute the effectiveness of his designs because
they are so widely copied.
|
|
see also
collection:
Georges
Lepape |

|
|
|
7.8 Georges Lepape, Vanity Fair, Feb 1930. Magazine cover.
Original artwork by
Georges Lepape.
|
|
|
see also collection:
Georges
Lepape
|

|

|
7.9 Mehemed Agha, Vanity Fair,
Feb 1930
|
7.10 Margaret Bourke-White et al, "Trapping the
Magical Waves of Sound",
Vanity Fair. May 1934, pp. 26-7.
|
|
|
Conde Nast, Vogue, and Fashion Photography
|
|
Although the magazines that Conde Nast oversaw until
bis death in
1942 included such notable publications as
Vanity Fair, House and Garden,
and Glamour, it was his original effort, Vogue, which
secured his place
in fashion history. Nast bought
Vogue in 1909 and
took what was then a small niche
publication aimed at New York society and transformed it into a fashion publication with a powerful
American and European
following; by 1920, Nast had established
British and French
editions.
As one of the leading fashion magazines in the United
States
(along with its rival
Harper's Bazaarj, Vogue was positioned to have
an enormous influence on the
industry. More than any other publication, Vogue engineered
the rise of fashion photography in the 1920s
and 1930s. Nast'
s first major coup was to sign Edward Steichen
(1879-1973) in 1923 as principal
photographer. Steichen quickly established a reputation as a stylish
innovator with artificial lighting. His commercial style was a
variant of the "straight photography" that he had pioneered in the
1910s with Alfred Stieglitz, whereby the model was shot with a view
towards eliminating obvious artifice, such
as soft focus,
and any overwhelming sentiment. Steichen also established the
precedent that fashion photography had to be technically perfect and
display the highest possible production values.
In the 1930s
Vogue and Steichen were joined by luminaries
including Baron George
Hoyningen-Huene, Cecil Beaton, Horst P.
Horst, and Andre Durst. Their
photographic work was furthered
by talented models such as Lisa Fonssagrives, who would appear on
hundreds of Vogue covers.
Fashion photographers faced an uneasy reputation
during their
heyday. With its unseemly ties to commerce, fashion
photography
was deemed beneath consideration as an art form (even
among its practitioners and patrons). Many fashion photographers
displayed a non-commercial "art" portfolio to potential clients to
convince them
of their artistic pedigree.
However, photography's artistic reputation shifted
dramatically
after the Second World War, when Steichen became the Director of
Photography at the Museum of Modern Art. In this
position that he
held for fifteen years, Steichen
helped to secure photography's place in
the
canon of modern art. Yet, to this day fashion photography remains
on the outside looking in, never having quite achieved the status of
an
art form.
|
|
Cipe Pineles
|
|
Agha enhanced his influence on American graphic
design
through the significant number of young proteges he groomed at Conde
Nast. This group included Alex Liberman and Cipe
Pineles (1910-1991), both of whom enjoyed considerable success
long after Agha left Conde Nast
in 1943. Pineles, a woman of Austrian ancestry who had emigrated to
New York in 1923, was
hired by Agha in 1933 to work at Vanity Fair and Vogue
(the former was absorbed
into Vogue in 1936). A fine example of
Pineles's work at Conde Nast is the April 1,1939 cover of Vogue
(fig. 7.11), which
features a full color image of two women's faces
by renowned photographer Horst P.
Horst (1906-1999). The dramatically cropped photo is off
center to the right and tilted
clockwise about 20 degrees so that the upper left corner points
at the magazine's name. The text and image in this manner
form a diagonal compositional
line that cuts across the page. The letters
that spell out "Vogue,"
in addition, are written in a decorous script,
an example of how Agha never established a fixed set of principles
for the cover, but rather allowed artists such as Pineles the
freedom to
design entire covers from scratch.
Pineles eventually moved on in 1942, to become the art
director of Glamour
magazine, where she would introduce many
of the modern design techniques
she had learned while working
for Agha. Pineles was a pioneer in that she was the
first woman art director of a mass-market periodical, and her
success at
Glamour
led to subsequent positions as art director at Seventeen,
Charm,
and Mademoiselle. Her work at Seventeen in the late
1940s
truly established her independent reputation as a talented modern
designer. In contrast to Vogue, where the cover logo changed
constantly to fit that issue's image, at Seventeen Pineles
employed a
standardized type, lower-case Bodoni in its bold, condensed italic
form. The cover photo generally featured a young woman, naturally
posed, as can be seen in the July 1949 cover (fig. 7.12). On
this cover, photographs by one of Pineles's own favorites,
Francesco
Scavullo (1921-2004), have been montaged so that at
first glance the viewer
perceives a reflected image. Only when one
studies how the hand in the top
image appears almost to grasp the umbrella in the lower photo
docs the true nature of the cover
become clear. The red, white, and blue palette connects the cover
to the 4th of July holiday. In the 1950s, outside the purview
of this chapter, Pineles became
famous for her innovative strategy of
employing established artists
such as Ben Shahn (1898-1969) as
magazine illustrators. In 1948, she became the first woman
granted membership in the prestigious New York Art
Directors' Club, a heretofore all-male bastion of design
professionals.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.11 Cipe Pineles, Vogue
Cover, April 1, 1939.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.12 Cipe
Pineles, Seventeen
Cover, July 1949.
|
|
|
Alexey Brodovitch
|
|
Alexey Brodovitch (1898-1971), another European immigrant
who became an influential art
director in America during the 1930s, was hired by Carmel
Snow (1887-1961), the editor of
Harper's Bazaar,
in 1934. Brodovitch worked on a
parallel track to that of Agha, introducing modern design
elements over a period of years.
While working in Paris during the 1920s, Brodovitch had become
acquainted with the work of Art Deco illustrators such as Cassandre,
whom he hired in 1938 to create a series of
dramatic covers for Harper's
Bazaar. The cover from October
1938 features an illustration by
Cassandre of a disembodied eye
and pair of lips (fig. 7.13). The rich red color and sinuous
shape of the lips as well
as the obvious care with which the eyelashes have been shaped
suggests that these are parts of a glamorous woman's
face. The shape of both the iris
and pupil of the eye is perfectly
round and suggestive of
Cassandre's early adoption of a style
influenced by Purism . However,
the use of fragments of a woman's body is evidence of the fact that
Cassandre had absorbed some of the principles of the French
Surrealist movement. Surrealist artists of the 1920s and 1930s such
as Joan Miro
(1893-1983)and Salvador Dali (1904-1989) often painted
images that contained
disembodied pieces of human anatomy;
these fragmented bodies were a
vehicle that allowed artists to convey
their dreams and fantasies. A great deal of Surrealist work
dealt with sexual fantasies, and the eye and lips
shown in Cassandre's cover design are emblematic of male desire.
Brodovitch also oversaw the design of some of the
most compelling
double-page spreads of photography and text ever seen.
Like Agha, he employed a series of prominent photographers,
including Horst P. Horst, Cecil Beaton (1904-1980), and George
Hoyningen-Huene (1900-1968), to create startling photographs
that served as the basis for the overall design of the spread.
Hoyningen-Huene shot the photo shown here, repeating the stylish
curve of the model's left hip with a shadow that drapes across
the right side of her form (fig.7.14). Brodovitch bled this
photo
across the gutter, where he formed a column of type into another
smooth curve that echoed the contour in the
photograph. The use of bold
lettering to start each line of text further emphasizes the
sweeping line that structures
the entire spread. Brodovitch used the eminently functional modern
seriffed typeface called
Bodoni for most of the text in Harper's Bazaar, showing that
sans serif type was not essential to the creation of a harmonious
modern design.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.13 A.M.
Cassandre,
Harper's Bazaar
Cover,
Oct 1938
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.14
Alexey Brodovitch,
Harper's Bazaar
Spread, March 15, 1938
|
|
|
PM Magazine
|
|
While mainstream magazines such as Harper's Bazaar and
Vanity
hair
brought new modern styles to the attention of the mainstream,
smaller trade publications that served design professionals
had an important role in educating a generation of young
American art directors. Among
the most prominent examples of
this type of periodical was
called PM Magazine, the initials standing
for "production manager," which first appeared in 1934 as a
mouthpiece of the typography firm called The
Composing Room,
This firm had been founded in 1927 by Sol Cantor (P-1965) and
Dr Robert L. Leslie (1885-1987), who sought to join
in the print advertising boom of
the 1920s. The early issues of PM Magazine,
edited by Percy Seitlin, focused
mainly on practical issues related
to the printing and typesetting
businesses. However, Leslie's interest in European design soon came
to the fore as the monthly
magazine focused more and more on
bringing European styles to
the attention of
American art directors.
In 1936 the magazine began publishing overviews of
individual European artists such as Lucian Bernhard, whose
Sachplakflt
style was the major topic of the March edition.
Bernhard
had immigrated to the United States in 1923 and had
established a successful freelance design firm there. He kept up
with innovations in graphic design and typography, and in 1929
he designed Bernhard Gothic
(fig. 7.15) for the American Type
Foundry, a "functionalist" sans
serif type intended to rival Paul Renner's ubiquitous Futura.
Bernhard served as the guest art
director for the March issue of PM Magazine, so he was able to
design the layout of
articles celebrating himself. The double page spread shown here
juxtaposes the almost mythical Priester poster
with a laudatory overview of Bernhard's work written by Seitlin
(fig. 7.16).
Bernhard adopted many of the principles of Constructivism in his new
job, using asymmetry as well as a red
geometric block in this composition.
The November 1937 issue devoted similar attention to
an
American artist, Lester Beall (1903-1969), suggesting that the
influx of European emigres was having an impact on homegrown
graphic designers. Beall created the cover image for the issue,
which wittily mocks the decorative excesses of conventional
typography by juxtaposing an elaborate Victorian "P" with a slab seriffed
"M" composed in a bold geometric fashion (fig. 7.17). Two red
rules
seem to reach out and pull the asymmetrical letter "M" into the
future, away from the ornamental past symbolized by the "P." The
dramatic use of negative white space also indicated Beall's
knowledge of the Constructivist style. The article on Beall's work
was
written by the advertising executive Charles Coiner (1898-1989), one
of the only non-artists involved in the industry to recognize
the potential for modern design at an early date.
Leslie and Seitlin were, of course, committed to Bauhaus
ideals of the integration of the design arts and architecture, and
numerous articles covered this subject over the magazine's eight
year run, including Gropius's "Essentials for
Architectural Education" in the February/March 1938 issue. For the
June/July 1938 edition, Beall oversaw the design of an issue devoted
to "The Bauhaus Tradition and the New Typography." The cover page
for that article, shown here, floats two lines of text so that
they offer the sparest indication of the underlying orthogonal grid
(fig. 7.18).
Aside from the Bauhaus, subsequent issues dealt with
other modern manifestations, such as the 1939 issue that declared
the 1930s to be "Agha's American Decade."
The magazine's focus on graphic design was finally indicated
by a title change in June of 1940, when PM Magazine became AD,
An Intimate Journal for Production Managers, Art
Directors, and their
Associates,
further highlighting the artistic interests of the editors.
During this period, Leslie also operated a small exhibition space
devoted to progressive graphic design in the offices of his firm.
Called the 'AD Gallery," it became an important meeting place for
like-minded young designers. The inaugural show at the gallery
featured the work of the then unknown Swiss emigre
Herbert Matter (1907-1984), who had recently arrived in New
York and was working as a photographer for Vogue and
Vanity
Fair.
Matter soon established a stellar career as a designer of corporate
identity as well as an educator at Yale University's influential
design program.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.15 Lucian Bemhard, Bemhard Gothic
Typeface, 1929.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.16 Lucian
Bernhard, PM Magazine, 1936. Archives & Special Collections,
RIT Library,
Rochester Institute of Technology,
Rochester, New
York.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.17 Lester
Beall, PM Magazine, Nov 1937, Archives & Special Collections,
RIT
Library,
Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.
|
|
|
7.18 Lester Beall, PM Magazine.
June/July 1938. Archives & Special Collections, RIT Library,
Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.
|
|
|
Government Patrons
|
|
|
The Great Depression
|
|
Amid all the glamour and affluence portrayed in
magazines such
as Vanity Fair during the 1930s, it easy to lose sight of
the fact
that most of the decade was spent in the grip of the Great
Depression. This severe economic
downturn began in October 1929, when "Black Monday" initiated a
stunning pullback in the
American equities markets. The decline in prices was exacerbated
by the fact that many
Americans had bought stock using loans,
or margin, and were unable to pay
off their newly acquired debts. The stock market crash alone did not
cause the Great Depression,
but it set off a chain of
financial calamities that resonated throughout the United
States and Europe.
By
1933, unemployment in the United States surpassed 30
per cent. Because of the
continuing effects of the Great Depression, some graphic designers
were forced to turn to the government for work as the commercial
segment of the market contracted. The new administration
elected in 1932 under President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945)
sought to alleviate the crisis by
hugely increasing the federal workforce. Roosevelt
established the Works Project
Administration (WPA), whose most
visible work involved the construction of hundreds of public projects,
mainly roads, dams, and government buildings. However,
one branch of the WPA, called
the Federal Art Project (FAP), was
given the responsibility of
providing government work for artists
in a variety of fields. Much of
the work sponsored by the FAP
consisted of fine an, especially
murals to decorate the hundreds of new public buildings, but a small
subset was devoted to poster
design. During an eight-year
period, the FAP commissioned over 35,000 unique designs,
resulting in 2 million published posters.
|
|
FAP Posters
|
|
The FAP viewed the poster as a democratic art form,
one that
could reach out to people from all walks of life, especially those
not of the elite, who were for the most part excluded from the
study and appreciation of fine art. Stylistically speaking, this
government patronage had the opposite effect from what one might
expect, as it led to a more open environment in which the
introduction of sophisticated Art Deco styles became widespread
tor the first time. Under the FAP, American artists were free to
pursue the modernist styles that corporate advertisers in the
United States had largely shunned.
As many as one third of the FAP posters were produced
in New York City. Richard Floethe (1901-1988), the German-born
director of the New York poster division of the FAP from 1936 until
1939, had trained as a student at the Bauhaus in the 1920s. As a
poster designer in the United States, he favored Art Deco
over more austere Constructivist styles, although the
influence of
the Bauhaus is also visible in his frequent use of
Josef Albers's
Stencil lettering. Floethe's 1936 poster publicizing an FAP art
exhibition displays the rounded curves and elegant, idiosyncratic
sans serif lettering typical of An Deco (fig. 7.19). Like the
majority
of the graphic works produced by the FAP, this poster is a small
(14 by 22 inches) silkscreen that uses a restricted palette. The
silkscrcen process, whereby ink is pushed through a taut screen of
fabric, was first introduced in the New York division by Anthony
Velonis (1911-1997), who adapted it from his knowledge of commercial
printing techniques. Silkscreen ing, which was most often
used for graphic ephemera, was much less expensive than
lithography, and after an eight-color process was developed it
allowed
for almost as much range of color. After the FAP artists shifted to
silkscreening, their output increased tremendously.
For example, the New York shop often printed over 500 posters in a
single day.
The FAP posters were viewed by a dramatically larger
audience
than the educated elite who read Fortune, Vogue, or Vanity
Fair.
Despite their banal subject matter and obviously inexpensive
production values, these posters functioned to awaken the broader
American public to the beauty of Art Deco abstraction in
a way that no magazine would have been able to. Like the posters
of Edward McKnight Kauffer designed for the London
Underground, images such as Foreign Trade Zone No. 1, by
Martin
Weitzman, appeared normative and non-threatening (fig. 7.21).
Weitzman's poster uses a style based on Cassandre's Purist work
(see fig. 4.39), which reduces the bow of the ship to a flat plane
that runs off of the frame on three sides. The vertically proportioned
lettering complements the towering height of the ship's
prow. This striking style had a
real potential to offend conservative American viewers; but this
potential was nullified by the official, government-sanctioned
nature of the message, complete with the name of the Mayor of New
York. How could a poster that is signed by the Commissioner
of the Department of Docks
seem too radical?
One of the most visually strong posters to come out of the FAP was
printed under the aegis of the Chicago division. This
silkscreen by an artist named Carken suggests familiarity with the
Sachplakat style, as the illustration of the powerful panther
has
been joined with simple, declarative text (fig. 7.20). The
flatly
rendered panther
crouches in the ambiguous space created by the words "Brookside" and
"Zoo," tying text and image together
with its tail.
This connection is reinforced by the way in which the animal's
tongue picks up the orange color of the lettering.
The wide block
of letters spelling out "Brookside" complements the panther's torso
and tail just as the compact mass of the letters in the word "Zoo"
echoes the coiled muscles of his chest and
head. In 1942, after the United States
had entered the Second World War,
the FAP poster division was transferred to the Defense
Department Graphic Section, through which graphic designers
continued to serve the government.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.19 Richard
Floethe, Oils and Watercolors Exhibition. 1938,
Works Progress Administration.
Poster. Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.20 Carken, Brookside Zoo,
1936. Color silkscreen.
Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.21 Martin Weitzman. Foreign Trade Zone No.1,
1937.
Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
Lester
Beall
|
|
Lester Beall,
born in Missouri, moved in 1935 to New York City,
where he opened
a freelance graphic design business. During the 1930s, Beall was one
of the most important homegrown
American
designers to adopt sophisticated European styles. Among his
important early works are a series of posters designed
for the Rural
Electrification Administration, a government body
that promoted the use of electricity in
the countryside. A 1937 poster
trumpeting the relatively new technology of radio (which
was made possible by
electricity) uses a simple abstract scheme to convey its message
(fig. 7.22). The three white arrows are
obliquely positioned so that
they create a modicum of space in
what is an otherwise completely
flat plane, the single word "radio"
attached to the
surface confirming its two-dimensionality. The
white arrows are
balanced by the red contour line that runs from
the middle to
the lower right corner of the page. What so distinguishes
Beall's work from that of his contemporaries is the manner in which
he eschews most of the decorative excesses of Art Deco in favor of a
more radically simplified Constructivist style. The lack of
"styling" in the arrows or the lettering is evidence of his
penchant for clear, functional design solutions.
Beall's 1937
work for the Department of Agriculture effectively integrates black
and white photography with an abstract
geometric
background (fig. 7.23). The horizontal bars of the fence
echo the red and white striped
background, while the grinning
children convey an upbeat message that is reinforced by the
patriotic use of color. In a nice touch, the stenciled lettering
appears to be printed on the fence itself, although the
shadow on the diagonal
crosspiece reduces the legibility of some of the letters. The
stenciling in Beall's poster represents not a sophisticated
"universal" alphabet, but rather the prosaic look of everyday
official writing on crates. Finally, the slightly off-kilter angle
of the photograph vis a vis the background creates a shallow space while also
breaking the photograph out of the strict orthogonal grid.
In 1937, Beall received a huge honor when his work was featured
in a solo exhibition of graphic
design at New York's Museum
of Modern Art. As discussed
below, Beall's embrace of
Constructivism
perfectly complemented the interests of the museum's curators, who
sought to promulgate the more severe Constructivist style in the
face of an overwhelming attachment
to the stylish
Art Deco preferred in the United States.
|

|

|
7.22 Lester Beall, Rural
Electrification-Radio,
1937-41. Arcnives & Special
Collections, RIT Library, Rochester Institute
of Technology, Rochester, New York.
|
7.23 Lester Beall, Rural
Electrification Administration, 1937.
Library of Congress, Washington, DC.
|
|
|
|
The Museum of Modern Art
|
|
The Museum of
Modern Art (MoMA), which was established in
New York City in 1929, soon became an
important champion of modern
design in the United States. On November 8, 1929, the
MoMA opened officially to the
public. In The Nation, Lloyd Goodrich observed, "The
foundation of the new museum marks
the final apotheosis of
modernism and its acceptance into
respectable society." While
Goodrich was, of course, mainly referring to painting and
sculpture, from an early point the MoMA
also devoted resources to the
display of architecture and other related design materials. The
founding trustees of the museum included many prominent
industrialists such as A. Conger
Goodyear (1877-1964), but Frank
Crowninshield, the editor of
Vanity Fair,
also made the list. Throughout
the 1930s, the Rockefeller family and other wealthy philanthropists
provided considerable financial support and status to the museum,
securing for it a
significant role in American cultural life. This section surveys
four exhibitions held at the MoMA during the 1930s that
had a considerable impact on the
way in which Americans perceived
modern graphic design.
|
|
|
The
International Style
|
|
At the MoMA, there was a decided emphasis on Constructivist
functionalism,
which was considered to be a much more significant
development than the "modernistic" Art Deco. The first
show at the MoMA that advocated a Constructivist aesthetic was
focused exclusively on
architecture. "Modern Architecture:
International Exhibition,"
curated by Philip Johnson
(1906-2005) and Henry-Russell Hitchcock (1903-1987),
opened in 1931 (fig. 7.24),
providing a survey of modern architecture that the
organizers grouped under a new term, the "International Style." A
book that was authored by the curators,
called The International Style: Architecture since 1922, was
published
in 1932 as an accompaniment to the exhibition. In this book,
Johnson and Hitchcock celebrated
the abstract geometric architecture
of great architects such as Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, Mies
van
der Rohe, and the De Stijl architect J. J. P. Oud as exemplary of
the rising new trend in building.
The authors identified three main aesthetic principles that
define the International Style
in architecture. While they did not
originally intend to prescribe the rules for architecture, but rather
to describe them, the
book became enormously influential for
modern architects. Additionally,
these principles of the International Style would prove to be
equally important to the
subsequent development of graphic design in the United States.
The first principle submitted by Hitchcock and Johnson stated
that modern architecture emphasized volume—the enclosure of
space by planar elements—over
mass. While difficult to translate
into
two-dimensional media, this rule resonates with the flat, geometric
planes of a lot of Constructivist graphic design. For
Hitchcock and
Johnson, the three-dimensional orthogonal skeletons of steel beams
that form the basic structure of a building are essential to
determining its form. Similarly, the grid is the underlying
element in Constructivist graphic designs.
Their second
principle called for "regularity as opposed to
symmetry," a
rule whose application in graphic design was
a major tenet
of Laszlo Moholy-Nagy and Jan Tschichold's New Typography. The
"regularity" invoked here refers to the same type of machine
standardization that is a prominent part of
Constructivism.
The third element of the International Style was
its dependence
on proportion, not applied ornament, as the basis
for its
aesthetic achievement. This is, of course, a central tenet of
graphic design
of the 1920s.
The
promulgation of the International Style in architecture
by the MoMA was based solely on aesthetic principles. Hitchcock
and Johnson deliberately ignored
what they called the "sociological
aspects" of modern architecture in their exhibition and book. In
this manner, the design principles of Russian Constructivism, De
Stijl, and the Bauhaus were introduced to an American audience completely devoid of political context. This gradual
depoliticization of
Constructivism was already traced in the context of the Bauhaus. It is striking how quickly
modern design, whose post-war
roots were so closely tied to political events in Russia and Germany, became completely detached
from its political history.
In regard to
lettering on the sides of buildings, which Hitchcock and Johnson
considered to be suitably functional as
opposed to
ornamental, they wrote, "Clear unseriffed letter forms
are most
legible at a good scale and conform most harmoniously to the
geometrical character of contemporary design." Invoking the
principle of regularity, they called for lettering to respect the
underlying geometric composition of the building. A good example of
this type of lettering existed at the Bauhaus, where
the name of the institution was
incorporated into the structure using Herbert Bayer's all-lower-case Universal. Like most
Constructivists, Hitchcock and Johnson were under the
misapprehension that sans serif lettering was more legible and
functionalist than traditional seriffed forms, while in reality the
serifs on letters serve to increase their legibility and especially
their readability (the body text of The International Style was set in roman). In
this case as in many
others, sans serif lettering is preferred for its
perceived, rather than
empirically deduced, functional qualities
in typography.
While
this theme will be developed in greater depth in
Chapter 8, it is crucial to note
how Constructivist graphic design
was aided by its perceived
aesthetic closeness to International Style architecture. This
alliance, which has its roots mainly in the
Gesamtkunstwerk
pursued at the Bauhaus, would
become very important in
establishing the intellectual and stylistic credibility
of functionalist graphics.
Anecdotally speaking, this analogy was
expressed best by the art director Charles Coiner when he called the
designer "the architect of the printed page." This is not to say
that graphic designers sought to connect their work to architecture
for the cynical purpose of gaining professional status, since
the stylistic parallels between the two arts had naturally developed
as pan of the modern movement.
During
the period covered by the exhibition at MoMA, the
radical simplification of form espoused by modern architects such
as Corbusier and Gropius was
almost completely absent from the American scene. Corporations in
the United States were only just
beginning to accept the
"modernistic" Art Deco style, which often
featured elaborate ornament that
violated one of the core tenets of the International Style. For
example, the same year of Hitchcock
and Russell's exhibition, New
York City residents witnessed the completion of the Art Deco
Chrysler building (fig. 7.25), by
William Van Alen (1883-1954).
Designed as the tallest manmade structure in the world, the
Chrysler building soared 1,046 feet
from Lexington Avenue to the top of its stainless steel spire. The
summit of the building is
composed of an eccentric series of seven
parabolic curves clad in
stainless steel, punctuated by triangular windows that radiate
upward. In addition, Van Alen placed steel
gargoyles at the corners of the
major setback, a medieval device
that, like the wheel-shaped
carvings near them, indicated the building's ties to the automobile
industry. An iconic example of
the opulent use of geometric
ornament characteristic of Art Deco,
the flamboyant decorative scheme is completely at odds with the
austere functional ism of the International Style. The Chrysler
building celebrates mass, symmetry, and applied ornament, and is
indicative of how completely marginalized the Constructivist style
was in the United States at this time.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.24 Philip Johnson and Henry-Russell Hitchcock
(curators),
"Modern Architecture;
international Exhibition,"
Museum of
Modem Art, New York, 1931.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.25 William van Alen, Chrysler
Building, New
York, 1928-30.
|
|
|
The "Machine
Art" Exhibition
|
|
In March 1934,
MoMA opened its "Machine Art" exhibition, the
second to
assert the primacy of the machine aesthetic in modern life. This
unique exhibition focused on objects that were traditionally
excluded from the museum realm, such as industrial products,
mass-produced furniture, and even scientific instruments.
The conceptual basis of the "Machine Art" show was set
out in the introduction to the catalog,
which opened with an excerpt
from the writings of Plato. "By beauty of shapes ... I mean straight
lines and circles, and shapes, plane or solid, made from them by
lathe, ruler, and square. These are not, like other
things, beautiful relatively, but
always and absolutely." The Neoplatonist basis for the beauty of
geometric abstraction had, of course, been asserted for years by the
artists of De Stijl, Purism,
ind the
Bauhaus. The catalog further draws a series of parallels
between the
"pure shapes" of machine-made objects and Plato's
Classical
aesthetic, celebrating the objects' kinetic rhythms, simplified
surfaces, visual complexity, and functional beauty.
The catalog that
accompanied the exhibition was notable for
its striking
cover, designed by Josef Albers (fig. 7.26). One of the
many
former Bauhaus professors who had emigrated from Germany some time
after the Bauhaus was closed by the Nazis
in 1933, Albers
had a significant impact on American graphic
design. The
cover is starkly simplistic, combining a photograph of one of the
objects in the show, SKF Industries' "Self-Aligning
Ball Bearing,"
with all-capital sans serif letters. There is a strong
contrast created
between the extreme close-up image of the circular ball bearing and
the architectonic structure of the typography.
In his essay in the "Machine Art" catalog, Philip Johnson, the
director of the MoMA's Department of Architecture and Industrial An,
sketched the last eighty years of industrial design
in terms of the reconciliation of handcrafted quality with mechanical
reproducibility. Using architecture as an analogy, he asserted
that design had developed separately but toward the same end—
showing sturdy simplicity and the elimination of superfluous
ornament. The exhibition at the MoMA was based on Bauhaus principles
of Constructivist functionalism, and the curators
rejected the opulent ornament of An Deco. Citing an American
need to resist the
"'modernistic' French machine-age aesthetic," Johnson reminded his
readers diat in America the machine tradition
is "purer and stronger." He also took a swipe at "styling"
firms, which
Johnson felt were responsible for the overzealous use
of streamlining
as ornament. This use of a machine element as a
decorative
device was abhorrent to functionalist artists because it
subverted the
underlying principles of machine art.
At the time of
the "Machine Art" exhibition, the American
market for
luxury goods was saturated with Art Deco objects.
American Art
Deco often stressed the streamlined look whereby ornamental
geometric lines determined the form of the composition. A good
example of this type of work can be seen in the
Zephyr Clock
from
1933 (fig. 7.27) by Karl Emanuel Weber (Kem)
(1889-1963).
Manufactured by Lawson Time Inc. in a combination of brass and
copper with celluloid numerals, the clock features two rounded
curves, one on the vertical axis and one on the horizontal. Born in
Berlin, Weber had been working in San
Francisco on
behalf of the German government in 1915, when he
was stranded by
the First World War. He set up shop in the United States, and
established a thriving design practice in Los
Angeles. The
Desk Clock is exemplary of the sort of object that Philip
Johnson disliked because it uses streamlining "dishonestly,"
its form being
essentially decorative as opposed to functional.
An Deco
designers shared the same love of decorative elegance
as their counterparts in Art Nouveau. A stunning stylistic
comparison can
be made between Hector Guimard's Paris Metro
trom (see fig. 1.15) and an Art Deco interior space
designed by John
Eberson (1875-1964) for the Colony Theater
in 1930
(fig. 7.28). The sinuous curves of Art Nouveau have been
replaced by the
planar geometric abstraction of Art Deco. Of course, the work of the
Art Nouveau designer Henry van de
Vclde seemed to
anticipate the geometric stylization of Art Deco
in many ways. It
is also important to recognize how the MoMA's embrace of strict
machine functionalism was
not widespread
in the 1930s, when Art Deco took precedence
:n American
industrial and graphic design.
|
|

|
|
7.26 Josef Albers,
Machine Art,
Exhibition Catalog,
Museum of Modern Art, New
York,
1934.
|

|

|
7.27 Kem Weber, Zephyr Clock, 1933.
The Minneapolis Institute of Arts, Minneapolis, MN. The
Modernism
Collection. Gift of Norwest Bank.
|
7.28 John Eberson, Colony Theater,
originally designed 1930, renovation
in 1990.
Mesbur & Smith Architects,
Ontario & Process Creative Studios
Inc. Cleveland, OH.
|
|
|
|
The "Cubism and
Abstract Art" Exhibition
|
|
The influential
exhibition "Cubism and Abstract Art," curated by MoMA director,
Alfred H. Barr, Jr (1902-1981), opened in April 1936. This show
represented the first historical survey in the
United States of abstract art, mainly painting, dating from 1890 to
1935. While "Cubism and Abstract An" focused primarily on painting,
a variety of related manifestations in
industrial
design, the theater, and even abstract film were also
included.
Although only brief mention was made of graphic
design and
typography, the accompanying catalog, written by
Barr, made
clear that these were important parts of the Russian
Constructivist
and De Stijl movements.
In a startlingly
innovative employment of graphic design
outside its
usual context, the jacket of the Cubism and Abstract Art
catalog
displayed the history of modern painting in diagrammatic
fashion
(fig. 7.29). This illustration, designed by Barr himself,
applied the
emerging discipline of "information design" to the history of art.
Like Harry Beck's map of the London Underground, also designed in
the 1930s (see fig. 4.15), this diagram was intended to render
complex information and
interrelationships schematically, in a clear and logical manner.
Using the simple red and black color scheme favored by
Constructivists
and championed at the MoMA, Barr attempted
to show that modern an had formed two
streams—a geometric one encompassing Art Deco and Constructivism, and a non-geometric,
Expressionist one. Barr's diagram became more controversial
than most examples of information design, because later an
historians felt that the reductive nature of the exercise tended
to oversimplify a vast and often
contradictory subject.
As was typical
of modern art exhibitions at the MoMA, "Cubism and Abstract Art"
emphasized stylistic development over
a consideration
of subject matter; the political ramifications of
Constructivism,
in particular, were largely glossed over. However,
the rise of
Nazism in Germany and the Nazis' hostility to abstract art was the
subject of an introductory paragraph in the catalog. In this
statement, titled "Contrast—and Condescension," Barr
called attention to the transformation
that was occurring in German
versus American aesthetic taste. Illustrated with two posters
advertising the "Koln Pressa," a printing exhibition held
in Cologne in 1928 (fig.
7.30), Barr sought to make the point that abstraction was being
suppressed in Germany just as it was gaining a foothold in
the United States. The poster on the left,
by H. Nockiir, was illustrated
to serve as a foil to the one on the
right, because for Barr the
former, aimed at English-speakers, represented "the fairly realistic
poster style common to mediocre
travel posters the world over." Of course, Barr and other MoMA
curators' hostility toward Art
Deco was well established at this
point. Further on, Barr praises
the highly abstract Constructivist style of the other poster,
by Fritz Ehmcke (1878-1965). While
condemning the Nazis, Barr also
used this comparison in order to make a backhanded criticism of the
philistine taste of most American commercial artists and their
patrons.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.29 Alfred H. Barr, Cubism
and Abstract Art,
Exhibition Catalog,
Museum of Modem Art, New York, 1936
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.30 (a) H. Nockur, Pressa, Koin 1928, 1928.
Poster, (b) Fritz Ehmcke, Koln, Pressa 1928,
1928. Poster. Museum fur Gesltatung, Zurich. Poster Collection.
|
|
The "Bauhaus
1919-1928" Exhibition
|
|
The MoMA made a
further commitment to the machine aesthetic and Constructivism when
it brought the art of the Bauhaus to the public in 1938, the year
that the exhibition "Bauhaus 1919-1928" opened. Over the previous
two years, numerous faculty members from the Bauhaus, including
Herbert Bayer, Walter Gropius,
Ludwig Mies van
der Rohe, Josef Albers, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy,
and Marcel
Breuer, had all immigrated to the United States. This
is not to give the impression that the
entire faculty fled Germany the
moment that the Nazis came to power; on the contrary, Bayer
pursued a private practice in
Berlin for several years, accepting
numerous government-sponsored
commissions, including some
that made clear references to the Nazis' perverse ideological concerns.
MoMA's show featured a unique installation designed by Bayer that
highlighted the leadership of Gropius in formulating
the new school's aesthetic
principles. The accompanying catalog, edited by Bayer as well as
Gropius and his wife, Ise, served as a sourcebook of primary
materials related to the Bauhaus. Bayer designed the typography and
layout of the accompanying catalog,
using a sans serif
characteristic of the New Typography throughout
the text. In order to illustrate the post-1925 introduction of
all lower-case lettering
at the Bauhaus, Bayer eliminated capitalization
from the concluding sections of the catalog (fig. 7.31). He
also structured the text
and images with regularity, not symmetry,
while making use of
Constructivist devices such as the bold arrow
in the lower left margin. As was
the case with the "International Style" and "Machine An" exhibitions
before it, here again the
MoMA asserts the significance of Constructivism over the ornamental
decadence of the Art Deco.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.31 Herbert Bayer, Bauhaus Catalog,
1938
|
|
|
Pulp Magazines
|
|
In striking
contrast to the elite styles both of Art Deco and Constructivism,
which advanced in the United States during the 1930s, are the
thousands of covers made for pulp magazines. In
many ways a
response to the misery of the Great Depression, pulp
fiction
flourished in the United States during this period, offering
people an escape
through stories of mystery, adventure, and sexuality.
Millions of "pulp" magazines—so-called because the paper
used to print
them was of the lowest possible quality—formed a
thriving popular culture industry that
provided work for thousands of
artists.
The vast
majority of pulp magazine covers were created by
artists trained
in the traditional skills of representation, making their work
appear quite retrograde by the standards of Agha or
Beall. In fact,
pulp covers served those artists as a foil, exemplary
of everything
that modern design rejected, including realism and Expressionist
displays of emotion. Most pulp covers were originated
as oil paintings that measured roughly 20 by 30 inches,
with the artist often having only a
vague notion of the text that
served as the images' complement.
Designed to
catch a passerby's attention from the shelves of a
newsstand, pulp
covers usually featured brilliant colors and bold
design elements. One popular pulp genre
during the 1930s was
the science
fiction magazine, which focused on adventures in outer space. One of
the foremost designers of pulp science fiction
covers was Frank R. Paul (1884-1963),
an Austrian immigrant who had a background in architecture. Starting in 1926, Paul
created a plethora of covers for
the Hugo Gernsback science fiction empire, which included Amazing
Stories, Science Wonder,
and Wonder Stories. Paul's most famous works consist of architectural
fantasies that run the gamut of his imagination. The back
cover of one of the Amazing
Stories called Quartz City on Mercury,
for example, shows otherworldly
creatures inhabiting a tower
made up of hexagons (fig. 7.32). The jewel-like brilliance of the
predominantly red and
green palette calls attention to itself, as do the crystalline
shapes of the structures.
Most pulp
magazines trod very close to the edge of contemporary decency codes,
and some featured explicit themes of sexual
violence diat
were taboo for the respectable mainstream. The most overtly obscene
pulp publishing house was formed by Harry
Donenfeld
(1926-1965) and Frank Armer in 1934. Their company,
named Culture Productions presumably out of a sense of
irony,
commissioned covers that displayed explicit scenes of sex and
violence. For
example, the 1936 cover for Spicy Mystery Stories, by
HJ. Ward
(1909-1945), is a paean to voyeurism (fig. 7.33). The
beautiful young
assistant of a humpback archer has been brutally
bound to a
target; her eyes well with tears as she tries to ignore the leering
menace beside her. While her pink clothes suggest innocence, her
bare torso and jutting breasts are provocatively posed. In
typical pulp
fashion, the evildoer holds a phallic arrow close to her pelvic
region. The misogyny in images such as this one is as
palpable as the
bold color. Despite their myriad faults, the visceral
energy of this
type of representational drawing wits its heavy
chiaroscuro and bright palette appears more vital in some holistic
way than contemporary abstract designs. Ward was also responsible
for the cover that eventually put Culture Productions out of
business. In 1942, the mayor of
New York, Fiorello Laguardia, walked by a newsstand and a copy of
Spicy Mysteries caught his
eye, exactly as it was intended
to. Laguardia started an assault on
the Spicy empire, which was soon
forced to close.
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.32 Frank R. Paul,
Amazing
Stories,
1941.

Frank R. Paul,
Computer as Envisaged in 1927,
Illustration to the Thought Machine by Ammianus Marcellinus
|

|
Frank R. Paul,
Stories of the
Stars: Aldebaran
|
Frank R. Paul,
The Octopus Cycle (Lester and Pratt) Explorers in Africa are
Attacked by Giant Land-Octopi
|
Frank R. Paul,
The Thunderer
(A Typical Mad Scientist)
Dries up a Lake
|

|
Frank R. Paul,
Master of the Asteroid
|
Frank R. Paul,G
iant Flying-Boats of the 1930s
|
Frank R. Paul,
Martian Raiders
Using a Terrible Weapon of
Concentrated Sunlight Attack the City of New York
|

|
Frank R. Paul,
Into the Subconscious
|
Frank R. Paul,
Adventure Machines
|
Frank R. Paul,
Inhabitants of Mercury
|

|
Frank R. Paul,
Furry Bats from Pluto
|
Frank R. Paul,
Mars Martians
Enjoy Less Gravity But Must Withstand a Thinner Atmosphere
with Extreme Temperatures
|
Frank R. Paul,
Stories of the
Stars, Antares
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
7.33 H.J. Ward, Spicy Mystery
Stories,
1936. Magazine covet.
|
|